Cited by 58Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Platforms and Economics

Law and technologyThe end of the generative internet

Zittrain, Jonathan·2009·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Exploring the expectations and implications for version 2.0 of the Net's new gated communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1435417.1435426

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zittrain, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Zittrain, Jonathan
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2009-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
18-20
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W3111046069
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
28.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
internet governance, gated communities, internet law, technology regulation, online communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review