Cited by 28Service and Product InnovationDigital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation and Knowledge Management

Ecosystem value co-creation

Autio, Erkko, Thomas, Llewellyn D W·2018·Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract

Focusing on service provider-beneficiary dyads and inter-dyad interactions in service ecosystems, we combine generativity and service-dominant logic perspectives into a model of ecosystem value co-creation. We identify five value co-creation mechanisms: resource enrichment, knowledge spillovers, direct externalities, indirect externalities, and resource generation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ambpp.2018.15913abstract

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W.
Affiliations
Universitat Ramon Llull (ES)
Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
Published
2018-08
Volume
2018
Issue
1
Pages
15913
ISSN
  • 0065-0668 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6561
OpenAlex
W2822007731
Cited by
28
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
service ecosystems, generativity, service-dominant logic, resource enrichment, knowledge spillovers, externalities, resource creation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review