Cited by 384Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities

Kane, Shaun K., Jayant, Chandrika, Wobbrock, Jacob O., Ladner, Richard E.·2009·Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility

Abstract

Mobile devices provide people with disabilities new opportunities to act independently in the world. However, these empowering devices have their own accessibility challenges. We present a formative study that examines how people with visual and motor disabilities select, adapt, and use mobile devices in their daily lives. We interviewed 20 participants with visual and motor disabilities and asked about their current use of mobile devices, including how they select them, how they use them while away from home, and how they adapt to accessibility challenges when on the go. Following the interviews, 19 participants completed a diary study in which they recorded their experiences using mobile devices for one week. Our results show that people with visual and motor disabilities use a variety of strategies to adapt inaccessible mobile devices and successfully use them to perform everyday tasks and navigate independently. We provide guidelines for more accessible and empowering mobile device design.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1639642.1639663

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sears , A. , Lin , M. , Jacko , J. and Xiao , Y . ( 2003 ) When computers fade: Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. Proc. HCI International '03 . Mahwah, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 1298--1302. Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J. and Xiao, Y. (2003) When computers fade: Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. Proc. HCI International '03. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1298--1302.
  2. Tomioka , K. , Kato , S. and Mooney , A . ( 2002 ) A study on accessibility of cellular phones for users with disabilities . Proc. Universal Design Japan Conference. Tomioka, K., Kato, S. and Mooney, A. (2002) A study on accessibility of cellular phones for users with disabilities. Proc. Universal Design Japan Conference.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-10-25
Pages
115-122
OpenAlex
W2168842329
Cited by
383
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
FWCI
16.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
visual impairment, motor impairment, assistive technology, independent navigation, people with disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review