The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discrimination in online ad delivery
Abstract
Google ads, black names and white names, racial discrimination, and click advertising.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The impact of this work is undeniable -leading to voluntary moratoriums [30], and several successful lawsuits [75,79]; nation-wide waves of regulatory action and public outcry [74]; congressional hearings [3]; and the recalls or radical redesigns of the deployed algorithms [12,64,65,88].”
From Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governance (2022) · cites this paper as [79]
In the citing paper
“This is not to say that algorithmic profiling is not problematic.”
From Artificial intelligence in support of the circular economy: ethical considerations and a path forward (2024) · cites this paper as Sweeney 2013
Citations
Cites
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002561 · Cited by 4,504
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1218955.1218990 · Cited by 3,376
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-2555 · Cited by 1,030
The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names
Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/0033553041502180 · Cited by 669
Sweeney, L. (2013) · Queue · doi:10.1145/2460276.2460278 · Cited by 477
Self-citationUniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures
Scheer, T. J. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1081/e-epap2-407 · Cited by 403
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(2012) · CQ Press eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452241067.n3 · Cited by 275
Harris, P. M., & Keller, K. S. (2004) · Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1043986204271678 · Cited by 154
The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names
Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2003) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w9938 · Cited by 55
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1104.3913 · Cited by 55
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp , v. Public Service Commission of New York. Supreme Court of the United States, 447 U.S. 557 , 1980 . Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp, v. Public Service Commission of New York. Supreme Court of the United States, 447 U.S. 557, 1980.
- Google . Google announces first quarter 2011 financial results ; http://investor.google.com/earnings/ 2011 /Q1_google_earnings.html. Google. Google announces first quarter 2011 financial results; http://investor.google.com/earnings/2011/Q1_google_earnings.html.
- Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination , National Research Council. Measuring racial discrimination . National Academy Press , Washington, DC , 2004 . Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination, National Research Council. Measuring racial discrimination. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
- Sweeney , L. Discrimination in online ad delivery ( 2013 ). ( For de tails, see full technical report at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208240. Data, including Web pages and ads, archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads). Sweeney, L. Discrimination in online ad delivery (2013). (For details, see full technical report at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208240. Data, including Web pages and ads, archived at http://foreverdata.org/onlineads).
- U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Racism in America and how to combat it . Washington, DC , 1970 . U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Racism in America and how to combat it. Washington, DC, 1970.
- WebShot Command Line Server Edition. Version 1.9.1.1; http://www.websitescreenshots.com/. WebShot Command Line Server Edition. Version 1.9.1.1; http://www.websitescreenshots.com/.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 754
Detecting and Visualizing Filter Bubbles in Google and Bing
Dillahunt, T. R., Brooks, C. A., & Gulati, S. (2015) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2702613.2732850 · Cited by 35
“For example, in an investigation of the delivery of personalized ads for public records doing basic name searches, Sweeney found statistically significant results in the discrimination in ad delivery across two websites based on names alone [15].”
BackgroundEngström, E., & Strimling, P. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101396 · Cited by 34
Government Information Policy in the Era of Big Data
Washington, A. L. (2014) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12081 · Cited by 34
We Need Fairness and Explainability in Algorithmic Hiring
Schumann, C., Foster, J. S., Mattei, N., & Dickerson, J. P. (2020) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/yflu4600 · Cited by 34
“Sweeney [49] noted that queries for public records on Google resulted in different associated contextual ad-vertisements based on whether the query target had a traditionally African American or Caucasian name; in the former case, advertisements were more likely to contain text relating to criminal…”
BackgroundInvestigations of Performance and Bias in Human-AI Teamwork in Hiring
Peng, A., Nushi, B., Kıcıman, E., Inkpen, K. M., & Kamar, E. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21468 · Cited by 51
Preventing Disparate Treatment in Sequential Decision Making
Heidari, H., & Krause, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/311 · Cited by 35
“In recent years, numerous studies (see e.g. [Sweeney, 2013; Barocas and Selbst, 2016]) and media articles [Mann and O’Neil, 2016; Angwin et al. , 2016; Levin, 2016] have illustrated and cautioned against algorithmic unfairness.”
BackgroundGender bias in transformers: A comprehensive review of detection and mitigation strategies
Nemani, P., Joel, Y. D., Vijay, P., & Liza, F. F. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100047 · Cited by 55
Algorithms, ontology, and social progress
Iliadis, A. (2018) · Global Media and Communication · doi:10.1177/1742766518776688 · Cited by 33
“Algorithms may impact society in data-intensive contexts such as web advertising (Sweeney, 2013) and predictive sentencing guidelines (Angwin et al., 2016).”
BackgroundAlgorithmic Equity: A Framework for Social Applications
Osoba, O., Boudreaux, B., Saunders, J. M., Irwin, J., Mueller, P. A., & Cherney, S. (2019) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rr2708 · Cited by 35
Online Certification of Preference-Based Fairness for Personalized Recommender Systems
Do, V., Corbett‐Davies, S., Atif, J., & Usunier, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i6.20606 · Cited by 45
Gender Bias in Contextualized Word EmbeddingsPreprint
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordóñez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.03310 · Cited by 109
“Gender bias has been shown to affect several realworld applications relying on automatic language analysis, including online news (Ross and Carter, 2011), advertisements (Sweeney, 2013), abusive language detection (Park et al.”
BackgroundBerendt, B., & Preibusch, S. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0055 · Cited by 32
Machine Decisions and Human Consequences
Scantamburlo, T., Charlesworth, A., & Cristianini, N. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0003 · Cited by 32
Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis
Díaz, M., Johnson, I. L., Lazar, A., Piper, A. M., & Gergle, D. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/852 · Cited by 32
Creating a world where anyone can belong anywhere: Consumer equality in the sharing economy
Lee, K., Hakstian, A., & Williams, J. D. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.036 · Cited by 32
Baumer, E. P. S., Berrill, T. J., Botwinick, S. C., Gonzales, J. L., Ho, K., Kundrik, A., Kwon, L., LaRowe, T., Nguyen, C., Ramirez, F., et al. (2017) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/3148330.3149405 · Cited by 36
XRay: Enhancing the Web's Transparency with Differential CorrelationPreprint
Lécuyer, M., Ducoffe, G., Lan, F., Papancea, A., Spahn, R., Chaintreau, A., Geambasu, R., Petsios, T., & Al, E. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 32
Considerations on Recommendation Independence for a Find-Good-Items Task
Kamishima, T., & Akaho, S. (2018) · doi:10.18122/b2871w · Cited by 32
“Sweeny presented an example of dubious advertisement placement that appeared to exhibit racial discrimination [21].”
BackgroundResearch Challenges at the Intersection of Big Data, Security and Privacy
Kantarcıoğlu, M., & Ferrari, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00001 · Cited by 33
“The lack of transparency in data-driven decision-making algorithms can easily conceal fallacies and risks codified in the underlying mathematical models, and nurture inequality, bias, and further division between the privileged and the under-privileged (Sweeney, 2013).”
BackgroundAverage User-Side Counterfactual Fairness for Collaborative Filtering
Shao, P., Wu, L., Zhang, K., Lian, D., Hong, R., Li, Y., & Wang, M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3656639 · Cited by 31
“Recommender systems are making a critical impact on humans and society, shaping the movies we watch, the news we read, the jobs we seek, and more [32, 59, 60].”
BackgroundMitigating Gender Bias Amplification in Distribution by Posterior Regularization
Jia, S., Meng, T., Zhao, J., & Chang, K.-W. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.264 · Cited by 30
Perception of Fairness in Algorithmic Decisions: Future Developers' Perspective
Kleanthous, S., Kasinidou, M., Barlas, P., & Otterbacher, J. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100380 · Cited by 37
“This is consistent with their responses on defining fairness where the majority made references to objective factors and those that have been focused on for analyses in the most prominent research in the field of fairness, accountability, and transparency [of algorithms].(54,58,59) Maybe the respondents, being student…”
BackgroundMethodLi, R., Kingsley, S., Fan, C., Sinha, P., Wai, N., Lee, J., Shen, H., Eslami, M., & Hong, J. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3582074 · Cited by 38
“Past research has successfully identied harmful and discriminatory behaviors in a variety of algorithmic domains, including search engines [52, 54, 60], online advertising [45, 67], facial recognition [10], word embedding [7], and e-commerce [40].”
BackgroundTowards Consumer-Empowering Artificial Intelligence
Contissa, G., Lagioia, F., Lippi, M., Micklitz, H., Pałka, P., Giovanni Sartor, B., & Torroni, P. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/714 · Cited by 32
“…to consumers stemming from the use of AI made by business, such as the risk of replicating societal bias in advertising leading to discrimination [Sweeney, 2013], from the challenges to enforcers in oversight and detection, stemming both from the “black-box” problem, and from background…”
BackgroundEpistemic fragmentation poses a threat to the governance of online targeting
Milano, S., Mittelstadt, B., Wachter, S., & Russell, C. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00358-3 · Cited by 29
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Defence
Taddeo, M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745441.001.0001 · Cited by 30
China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together
AlShebli, B., Memon, S. A., Evans, J. A., & Rahwan, T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-79863-5 · Cited by 38
“Although artificially intelligent systems may reduce human error, they may also exacerbate discrimination against minorities by targeting disadvantaged groups or training on data that reflect systematic and persistent biases [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25].”
Learning Fair Classifiers: A Regularization-Inspired Approach.
Bechavod, Y., & Ligett, K. (2017) · Cited by 31
Why software engineering courses should include ethics coverage
Narayanan, A., & Vallor, S. (2014) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2566966 · Cited by 28
Data Responsibly: Fairness, Neutrality and Transparency in Data AnalysisPreprint
Stoyanovich, J., Abiteboul, S., & Miklau, G. (2016) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · doi:10.5441/002/edbt.2016.103 · Cited by 28
“Bias may come from the c©2016, Copyright is with the authors.”
BackgroundAuditing Offline Data Brokers via Facebook's Advertising Platform
Venkatadri, G., Sapiezynski, P., Redmiles, E. M., Mislove, A., Goga, O., Mazurek, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2019) · The World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313666 · Cited by 35
“Other researchers [17, 46] have demonstrated that these weaknesses are not confined to Facebook, and are present in Google’s ad platform as well.”
BackgroundCausal Inference for Recommendation: Foundations, Methods, and Applications
Xu, S., Ji, J., Li, Y., Ge, Y., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3714430 · Cited by 40
“science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) topics, which may affect society for generations; An unfair ad recommendation may even result in racial discrimination [148].”
Unveiling the Impact of AI Technological Anxiety on the Marketers' Intention to Adopt Generative AI
Meng, T., Li, X., Alam, F., Yan, Y., & Chau, T. (2025) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.372177 · Cited by 33
Wei, M., Stamos, M., Veys, S., Reitinger, N., Goodman, J. R., Herman, M., Filipczuk, D., Weinshel, B., Mazurek, M. L., & Ur, B. (2020) · USENIX Security Symposium · Cited by 26
Jurowetzki, R., Hain, D. S., Mateos-Garcia, J. C., & Stathoulopoulos, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.01648 · Cited by 72
“…today, algorithmic bias, has been identified as one such problem, where technologies are clearly in conflict with social values and regulations but lack of technological insight are hindering regulation (Sweeney, 2013; Hajian et al., 2016; Zou and Schiebinger, 2018; Clark and Hadfield, 2019).”
BackgroundYadav, A. K., & Heath, M. K. (2022) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00734-9 · Cited by 26
“Another example of bias is online advertising that delivers ads of arrest at a significantly higher rate for Black-identifying names than White-identifying names (Sweeney, 2013).”
BackgroundA Sociotechnical Audit: Assessing Police Use of Facial Recognition
Radiya-Dixit, E., & Neff, G. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594084 · Cited by 36
“Algorithmic audits have exposed biased outcomes in a variety of domains including criminal justice [6, 40, 89], tenant screening [56, 83], healthcare [31, 72], and online advertising [57, 92].”
BackgroundClosing the AI Knowledge GapPreprint
Epstein, Z., Payne, B. H., Shen, J. H., Dubey, A., Felbo, B., Groh, M., Obradovich, N., Cebrián, M., & Rahwan, I. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.07233 · Cited by 39
“In2013,Sweeney’s study on discrimination showed that search results were disproportionately more likely to return results related to arrest when a racially associated name was used as a keyword in online advertisements [Sweeney, 2013].”
BackgroundMendonça, R. F., Almeida, V. A. F., & Filgueiras, F. D. B. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192870070.001.0001 · Cited by 28
AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps
Gao, D., Haverly, A., Mittal, S., Wu, J., & Chen, J.-D. (2024) · International Journal of Business Analytics · doi:10.4018/ijban.338367 · Cited by 14
“Some examples include Sweeney’s (2013) finding of discrimination in online ad delivery (Sweeney, 2013), Buolamwini and Gebru’s (2018) finding of bias in facial recognition systems that prefer lighter skin colors, and Veale and Binns’ (2017) finding of racial and social bias in using the location of…”
BackgroundModel-based and actual independence for fairness-aware classification
Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H., & Sakuma, J. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-017-0534-x · Cited by 25
“In Sweeney (2013), to investigate the fairness online of ad delivery, a sensitive feature, race, is predicted from an independent public dataset, the birth records of the state of California.”
BackgroundInfluentialTaking Data Out of Context to Hyper-Personalize Ads
Hanson, J., Wei, M., Veys, S., Kugler, M. B., Strahilevitz, L., & Ur, B. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376415 · Cited by 25
“Ads can also be racially discriminatory [45, 54] and involve sensitive categories (contrary to companies’ public statements) [30].”
BackgroundRedistribution and Rekognition
West, S. M. (2020) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v6i2.33043 · Cited by 33
Leiva, L. A., Arapakis, I., & Iordanou, C. (2021) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3406522.3446011 · Cited by 25
“advertisers [95], and consider targeting based on demographics to be discriminatory [93].”
BackgroundD’Arcy, A., & Bender, E. M. (2022) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-015324 · Cited by 32
Azer, J., Anker, T. B., Taheri, B., & Tinsley, R. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113567 · Cited by 28
“Furthermore, while the operationalization of race using profile pictures is new to the literature, it differs from that of using Black-sounding names (Edelman et al., 2017); digital racial profiling in online ad delivery (Sweeney, 2013); and race-targeted websites (Appiah, 2010).”
Gilheany, J., Wang, D., & Xi, S. (2015) · Cited by 25
Toward Controlling Discrimination in Online Ad AuctionsPreprint
Celis, L. E., Mehrotra, A., & Vishnoi, N. K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10450 · Cited by 25
“For instance, searches with “black-sounding” names were much more likely to be shown ads suggestive of an arrest record [24].”
BackgroundSarra, C. (2020) · Global Jurist · doi:10.1515/gj-2020-0003 · Cited by 24
(2020) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3375784 · Cited by 29
“Notably, however, the vast majority is focused on developed-world contexts: online domains such as targeted advertising [48], search engines [19], and facial recognition [4]; and offline domains such as criminal justice [3, 12], child maltreatment [13], and predictive policing [46].”
BackgroundNew Digital Inequalities. Algorithms Divide
Ragnedda, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49079-9_4 · Cited by 28
Gender bias in machine learning for sentiment analysis
Thelwall, M. A. (2018) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2017-0153 · Cited by 27
How Gender and Skin Tone Modifiers Affect Emoji Semantics in Twitter
Barbieri, F., & Camacho-Collados, J. (2018) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-2011 · Cited by 24
“…in diverse text data sources (Zhao et al., 2017), and have been proved to propagate to supervised and unsupervised techniques learning from them, including word embeddings (Boluk-basi et al., 2016; Caliskan et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2018) and end-user applications like online ads (Sweeney, 2013).”
BackgroundBaumer, E. P. S., Siedel, D., McDonnell, L., Zhong, J., Sittikul, P., & McGee, M. (2020) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1734460 · Cited by 24
“…issues that emerge in the sociotechnical gap (cf. Ackerman, 2000) between ML models that quantitatively perform well but produce confusing, misleading, biased, on nonsensical results (Barocas & Selbst, 2016; Bucher, 2017; DeVito, Hancock et al., 2018; Eslami et al., 2016, 2015; Sweeney, 2013).”
BackgroundConsumer Artificial Intelligence Mishaps and Mitigation Strategies
Saeedi, S., Fong, A. C. M., Mohanty, S. P., Gupta, A. K., & Carr, S. (2021) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2021.3075329 · Cited by 25
Context- and Fairness-Aware In-Process Crowdworker Recommendation
Wang, J., Yang, Y., Wang, S., Hu, J., & Wang, Q. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3487571 · Cited by 24
“And even ad recommenders can exhibit racial discrimination [67].”
Credible without Credit: Domain Experts Assess Generative Language Models
Peskoff, D., & Stewart, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.37 · Cited by 31
“Latanya Sweeney’s classic study of racial discrimination in online ads (Sweeney, 2013) points to the possibility that how a question is asked or where it is asked from could result in inaccurate or harmful answers for marginalized communities (see also Noble, 2018; Benjamin, 2019).”
BackgroundTewell, E. (2016) · portal Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2016.0017 · Cited by 24
Research Directions for Principles of Data Management (Abridged)
Abiteboul, S., Arenas, M., Barceló, P., Bienvenu, M., Calvanese, D., David, C., Hull, R. B., Hüllermeier, E., Kimelfeld, B., Libkin, L. O., et al. (2017) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/3092931.3092933 · Cited by 24
“Responsible data analysis practices must be transparent [35, 84], allowing a variety of stakeholders, such as end-users, commercial competitors, policy makers, and the public, to scrutinize the data collection and analysis”
BackgroundHitti, Y., Jang, E., Moreno, I., & Pelletier, C. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3802 · Cited by 24
“In the era of Machine Learning (ML), gender biases are translated from sourced data to existing algorithms that may re-flect and amplify existing cultural prejudices and inequalities (Sweeney, 2013) by replicating human behavior and perpetuating bias.”
BackgroundFrom Primary Education to Premium Workforce: Drawing on K-12 Approaches for Developing AI Literacy
Kaspersen, M. H., Musaeus, L. H., Bilstrup, K.-E. K., Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., Dindler, C., & Dalsgaard, P. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642607 · Cited by 28
“…advertisements, etc. Bold claims about the potentials of these technologies abound in this new “Summer of AI”, and while they pave the way for innovations, they also entail challenges about issues such as accountability and transparency, discrimination [2, 60], and fairness in decision-making [6].”
BackgroundThe algorithm knows I’m Black: from users to subjects
Meyerend, D. (2022) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437221140539 · Cited by 23
“Scholars such as Noble (2018), Benjamin (2019), and Sweeney (2013) insist that user behavior can also train an algorithmic system to produce problematic outputs in the context of machine learning because of the way that machine learning is conducted.”
BackgroundEthical Considerations and Fairness in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Neuroradiology
Filippi, C. G., Stein, J. M., Wang, Z., Bakas, S., Liu, Y., Chang, P., Lui, Y. W., Hess, C. P., Barboriak, D. P., Flanders, A. E., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a7963 · Cited by 32
“and allocational harm (from algorithms working less accurately).(20,21) A study of facial-recognition programs reported that”
BackgroundHofeditz, L., Mirbabaie, M., Luther, A., Mauth, R., & Rentemeister, I. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.018 · Cited by 26
Banging on a Locked Door: The Persistent Role of Racial Discrimination in the Workplace
Whitaker, T. R. (2019) · Social Work in Public Health · doi:10.1080/19371918.2019.1572564 · Cited by 22
“This pattern occurred whether there was an actual arrest associated with the name (Sweeney, 2013).”
BackgroundI Always Feel Like Somebody's Watching Me. Measuring Online Behavioural AdvertisingPreprint
Carrascosa, J. M., Mikians, J., Cuevas, R., Erramilli, V., & Nikolaos Laoutaris, B. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.5281 · Cited by 22
“tain types of interests and characteristics of users are used like gender, health and race [20] etc.”
Data Statements: From Technical Concept to Community Practice
McMillan-Major, A., Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2024) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3594737 · Cited by 21
“Data statements were initially proposed by Bender and Friedman [2] in response to growing awareness of the fact that Machine Learning (ML) approaches to language technology bring various risks of harm to both system users and others affected by system use [5, 25, 30].”
BackgroundAlgorithmic bias: Social science research integration through the 3-D Dependable AI Framework
Ukanwa, K. (2024) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101836 · Cited by 24
Potential for participatory big data ethics and algorithm design
Whitman, M., Hsiang, C.-Y., & Roark, K. (2018) · Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/3210604.3210644 · Cited by 20
“Given current public discourse, we expected the search to yield literature addressing criminal justice, especially related to predictive policing and sentencing procedures [1, 10, 24], in addition to research pertaining to other domains where algorithmic discrimination has prompted controversy: news/journalism, credit…”
Mendon-Plasek, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_2 · Cited by 23
“Important references on the subject include Sweeney (2013), O’Neil (2016), Barocas and Selbst (2016), Noble (2018), Eubanks (2018), Buolamwini and Gebru (2018), Ensign, Friedler, Neville, Scheidegger, and Venkatasubramanian (2018), and Benjamin (2019).”
BackgroundAuditing the Biases Enacted by YouTube for Political Topics in Germany
Heuer, H., Hoch, H., Breiter, A., & Theocharis, Y. (2021) · Message Understanding Conference · doi:10.1145/3473856.3473864 · Cited by 19
“[68], for instance, exposed discrimination in online ad delivery by Google.”
BackgroundApparent Algorithmic Bias and Algorithmic Learning
Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2020) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-024-09286-z · Cited by 28
“Sweeney (2013) concluded their study with ”Why is this discrimination occurring?”
InfluentialModel-Based Approaches for Independence-Enhanced Recommendation
Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H., & Sato, I. (2016) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2016.0127 · Cited by 21
“Sweeny presented an example of dubious advertisement placement that appeared to exhibit racial discrimination [1].”
BackgroundAysolmaz, B., İren, D., & Dau, N. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.648 · Cited by 22
“Algorithmic awareness - Enhance public awareness and knowledge about ADM systems to empower users [17, 28] - Increase awareness of users [17] - Raise awareness to possible biases inherent in ADM systems [15, 16]”
BackgroundTwo-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominancePreprint
Do, V., Corbett‐Davies, S., Jamal Atif, C., & Usunier, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15781 · Cited by 22
“The question of fairness in rankings originated from independent audits on recommender systems or search engines, which showed that results could exhibit bias against relevant social groups [57, 33, 21, 40, 35] Our work follows the subsequent work on ranking algorithms that promote fairness of exposure for individual…”
BackgroundPreventing Discriminatory Decision-making in Evolving Data Streams
Wang, Z., Saxena, N. A., Yu, T., Karki, S., Zetty, T., Haque, I., Zhou, S., KC, D. B., Stockwell, I., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3593984 · Cited by 20
“However, the growing reliance on automated decision-making systems has led to heightened scrutiny concerning issues of fairness and accountability in these models [12, 37, 53].”
BackgroundA Methodology for Information Flow Experiments
Tschantz, M. C., Datta, A. J., Datta, A., & Wing, J. M. (2015) · IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW) · doi:10.1109/csf.2015.40 · Cited by 19
“C R ] 1 0”
Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
Madhavan, R., & Wadhwa, M. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3340531 · Cited by 20
Search atlas: Visualizing divergent search results across geopolitical borders
Ochigame, R., & Ye, K. (2021) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 · doi:10.1145/3461778.3462032 · Cited by 23
“Other studies have compared search results for different queries, for example showing that Google searches for first names associated with Black Americans were more likely to yield discriminatory ads that suggested arrest records [9].”
ResultAlgorithmic agencing in platform markets
Wei, R., & Geiger, S. (2024) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/14705931241275558 · Cited by 20
“For example, algorithms can favor mainstream best sellers (Fleder and Hosanagar 2009), promote higher-priced items (Banker and Khetani, 2019), and might even foster social inequalities in markets (Glaser et al., 2021; Sweeney, 2013).”
The Externalities of Exploration and How Data Diversity Helps Exploitation
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603208 · Cited by 20
Why Organization Matters in “Algorithmic Discrimination”
Schwarting, R., & Ulbricht, L. (2022) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-022-00838-3 · Cited by 22
Srivastava, S., & Sinha, K. (2023) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.49990 · Cited by 19
MapWatch: Detecting and Monitoring International Border Personalization on Online Maps
Soeller, G., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C., & Wilson, C. (2016) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2872427.2883016 · Cited by 23
“First, we briefly sketch the”
Skirpan, M. W., YEH, T. P., & Fiesler, C. L. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173644 · Cited by 20
“However, if consumers really are performing this cost-benefit analysis and making a conscious decision, then why we do we see such hype and panic around risks and harms caused by technology in the media? Daily news headlines relay injustice [19, 1, 4, 33], personal boundary violations [32], and gloom [26, 18, 14] over…”
BackgroundTuringBox: An Experimental Platform for the Evaluation of AI Systems
Epstein, Z., Payne, B. H., Shen, J. H., Hong, C., Felbo, B., Dubey, A., Groh, M., Obradovich, N., Cebrian, M., & Rahwan, I. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/851 · Cited by 17
“As the proliferation of artificial intelligence continues, algorithmic bias within AI systems has become a popular topic of scientific study [O’Neil, 2017; Friedman and Nissenbaum, 1996; Sweeney, 2013; Hannak et al. , 2014].”
BackgroundFair k-Centers via Maximum Matching
Jones, M. R., Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 22
Discovering Unwarranted Associations in Data-Driven Applications with the FairTest Testing ToolkitPreprint
Tramèr, F., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Hubaux, J., Humbert, M., Juels, A., & Huang, L. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 18
Youth Data Literacy: Teen Perspectives on Data Created with Social Media and Mobile Devices
Acker, A., & Bowler, L. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.243 · Cited by 18
“Effectively searching is not a new information literacy skill, and yet, with search engines and the rise of personalization web tools that create filter bubbles, discerning readers need to understand the architecture of the data they are accessing and exposed to in platforms, in addition to the impact and results of a…”
BackgroundThe Challenges of Machine Learning and Their Economic Implications
Martín, P. B. I., & Unceta, I. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23030275 · Cited by 23
“Several technical solutions exist to prevent these three types of attacks, such as kanonymity [82,94], differential privacy techniques [28], and the use of synthetic data [95].”
BackgroundFairness in Rankings and Recommenders: Models, Methods and Research Directions
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00265 · Cited by 18
“Another well-known study shows that names used mostly by men and women of colour are much more likely to generate ads related to arrest records [2].”
BackgroundConceptualizing Algorithmic Stigmatization
Andalibi, N., Pyle, C., Barta, K., Xian, L., Jacobs, A. Z., & Ackerman, M. S. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580970 · Cited by 23
“Consider, for example, a search engine disproportionately displaying advertisements about criminal records when common African American names are searched [176].”
BackgroundMok, L., Nanda, S., & Anderson, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610100 · Cited by 22
“Following similar work on racial bias [14, 37, 98], we further generate obviously gendered names for the applicants by selecting the most popular and heavily gender-skewed names from a USA national names database 5 .”
MethodFrom Privacy Impact Assessment to Social Impact Assessment
Edwards, L., McAuley, D., & Diver, L. (2016) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw.2016.19 · Cited by 18
Skirpan, M. W., Cameron, J., & YEH, T. P. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174038 · Cited by 19
“Further work has made this risk evident as police face databases are biased toward African American faces [28], word embeddings have proven to encode gender stereotypes [10], and even behavioral advertising is codifying unfortunate racial differences [47].”
BackgroundFairness-aware Methods in Rankings and Recommenders
Pitoura, E., Stefanidis, K., & Koutrika, G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM) · doi:10.1109/mdm52706.2021.00013 · Cited by 17
“For example, names that are used by men and women of color are much more likely to generate ads related to arrest records [3].”
BackgroundIdentifying Stereotypes in the Online Perception of Physical Attractiveness
Araújo, C. S., Meira, W., & Almeida, V. A. F. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_26 · Cited by 18
“One example of such discrimination is, when searching the names of people with black last names, the higher likelihood of getting ads suggesting that these people were arrested, or face a problem with justice, even when it did not happen [8].”
BackgroundSelection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603209 · Cited by 21
Variations in Tracking in Relation to Geographic LocationPreprint
Fruchter, N., Miao, H., Stevenson, S., & Balebako, R. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.04103 · Cited by 18
“In this vein, numerous comparison-style studies have also been run, touching on diverse subjects such as discrimination in online advertising [18] and the effectiveness of online privacy tools [19].”
BackgroundThe Authority of "Fair" in Machine LearningPreprint
Skirpan, M. W., & Gorelick, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.09976 · Cited by 28
“…of bias and discrimination are being debated as ML systems for natural language processing [7], judicial sentencing [22], target advertising [13, 35], image classification [1], and facial recognition [9, 36] have all proven their ability to inherit bias and create disparate treatment across…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sweeney, L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sweeney, Latanya
- ORCID
- Sweeney, Latanya
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 44-54
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2095932468
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 63.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-1237235)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Keywords
- online advertising, racial discrimination, algorithmic discrimination, Google AdWords, algorithmic fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review