Cited by 659Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyLand Use and Ecosystem Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation

Meyfroidt, Patrick, Lambin, Eric F.·2011·Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Abstract

Although global rates of tropical deforestation remain alarmingly high, they have decreased over the period 2000–2010, and a handful of tropical developing countries have recently been through a forest transition—a shift from net deforestation to net reforestation. This review synthesizes existing knowledge on the occurrence, causes, and ecological impacts of forest transitions and examines the prospects and policy options for a global forest transition. The ecological quality of forest transitions depends on multiple factors, including the importance of natural forest regeneration versus plantations. Given an increased competition for productive land between different land uses, a global forest transition will require major technological and policy innovations to supply wood and agricultural products. In the globalization era, national strategies aimed at forest protection and sustainable use of forest resources may have unintended effects abroad owing to a displacement of land use across countries. Decisions by consumers combined with certification schemes and moratoriums have an increasing influence on the fate of forests.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 149 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Mather AS, 1992, Area, 24, 367
  2. Chokkalingam U, 2001, Int. For. Rev., 3, 19
  3. Carle J, 2008, For. Prod. J., 58, 6
  4. Wallerstein I, 1974, The Modern World-System
  5. Mather AS, 2007, Int. For. Rev., 9, 491
  6. 10.1023/A:1024430026953 · DOI
  7. Klock J, 1995, Korea J., 35, 119
  8. Totman C, 1986, Agric. Hist., 60, 23
  9. Wiersum KF, 2004, Agrofor. Syst., 61, 123
  10. Hughes JD, 1982, J. For. Hist., 26, 60
  11. Keogh RM, 2009, The future of teak and the high-grade tropical hardwood sector

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Earth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Center for Earth and Climate Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve B-1348, Belgium;
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2011-11-21
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
343-371
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
OpenAlex
W2140302389
Cited by
659
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
forest transition, tropical deforestation, natural forest regeneration, plantations, land use competition, forest conservation policy, sustainable forest use, globalization, consumer demand, certification schemes, moratorium, timber supply, agricultural commodities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review