Cited by 569T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Induced CD4+Foxp3+Regulatory T Cells in Immune Tolerance

Bilate, Angelina M., Lafaille, Juan J.·2012·Annual Review of Immunology

Abstract

Regulatory T lymphocytes are essential to maintain homeostasis of the immune system, limiting the magnitude of effector responses and allowing the establishment of immunological tolerance. Two main types of regulatory T cells have been identified—natural and induced (or adaptive)—and both play significant roles in tuning down effector immune responses. Adaptive CD4+Foxp3+regulatory T (iTreg) cells develop outside the thymus under a variety of conditions. These include not only antigen presentation under subimmunogenic or noninflammatory conditions, but also chronic inflammation and infections. We speculate that the different origin of iTreg cells (noninflammatory versus inflammatory) results in distinct properties, including their stability. iTreg cells are also generated during homeostasis of the gut and in cancer, although some cancers also favor expansion of natural regulatory T (nTreg) cells. Here we review how iTreg cells develop and how they participate in immunological tolerance, contrasting, when possible, iTreg cells with nTreg cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075043

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tregs exert immunosuppressive effects through multiple mechanisms, including cytokine secretion, metabolic disruption of effector T cells, and modulation of antigen-presenting cells.

    “These cells exert immunosuppressive effects through multiple mechanisms, including cytokine secretion, metabolic disruption of effector T cells, and modulation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (Bilate and Lafaille 2012; Josefowicz et al. 2012; Wing et al. 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bilate, A. M., & Lafaille, J. J.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Immunology
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
733-758
ISSN
  • 0732-0582 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-3278
OpenAlex
W2160458616
Cited by
569
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI041647, R01AI41647)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
induced regulatory T cells, natural regulatory T cells, Foxp3, immune tolerance, antigen presentation, chronic inflammation, infection, intestinal homeostasis, tumor immunology
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Lymphoid Tissue, CD4 Antigens, Adoptive Transfer, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Forkhead Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review