Cited by 111Spaceflight effects on biologyBone health and osteoporosis researchSpace Exploration and Technology

Fifty Years of Human Space Travel: Implications for Bone and Calcium Research

Open access
Smith, S.M., Abrams, S.A., Davis-Street, J.E., Heer, M., O'Brien, K.O., Wastney, M.E., Zwart, S.R.·2014·Annual Review of Nutrition

Abstract

Calcium and bone metabolism remain key concerns for space travelers, and ground-based models of space flight have provided a vast literature to complement the smaller set of reports from flight studies. Increased bone resorption and largely unchanged bone formation result in the loss of calcium and bone mineral during space flight, which alters the endocrine regulation of calcium metabolism. Physical, pharmacologic, and nutritional means have been used to counteract these changes. In 2012, heavy resistance exercise plus good nutritional and vitamin D status were demonstrated to reduce loss of bone mineral density on long-duration International Space Station missions. Uncertainty continues to exist, however, as to whether the bone is as strong after flight as it was before flight and whether nutritional and exercise prescriptions can be optimized during space flight. Findings from these studies not only will help future space explorers but also will broaden our understanding of the regulation of bone and calcium homeostasis on Earth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071813-105440

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of increasing intakes of calcium, fluoride, or phosphate were unsuccessful in mitigating bone loss.

    “The potential for nutrition to mitigate this bone loss was identified early but studies of increasing intakes of calcium, or fluoride, or phosphate, were unsuccessful74,77,79,82–84.”

    From Red risks for a journey to the red planet: The highest priority human health risks for a mission to Mars (2020) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Nutritional Countermeasures section says calcium supplementation was tested in bed-rest studies without success and that excess calcium will not suppress microgravity-related bone loss. The References list a study of supplementary calcium and phosphate, but the copy does not report its outcome; it also does not establish that increased fluoride intake failed. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An increase in bone resorption was the likely culprit and bone formation was largely unchanged in microgravity or ground analogs.

    “It has been shown that an increase in bone resorption was the likely culprit and that bone formation was largely unchanged in microgravity or ground analogs77–79.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [51]51. Jowsey J. 1971. Bone at the cellular level: the effects of inactivity. In Hypogravic and Hypodynamic Envi- ronments, NASA Spec. Publ. SP-269, ed. RH Murray, M McCally, pp. 111-19. Washington, DC: Natl. Aeronaut. Space Adm.
  2. [150]150. Whedon GD, Lutwak L, Rambaut PC, Whittle MW, Smith MC, et al. 1977. Mineral and nitrogen metabolic studies, experiment M071. In Biomedical results from Skylab, NASA Spec. Publ. SP-377, ed. RS Johnston, LF Dietlein, pp. 164-74. Washington, DC: Natl. Aeronaut. Space Adm. 155.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S. M., Abrams, S. A., Davis-Street, J. E., Heer, M., O'Brien, K. O., Wastney, M. E., & Zwart, S. R.
Affiliations
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Chevron Services Company, Corporate Health and Medical, Houston, Texas 77002;
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Metabolic Modeling Services, West Lafayette, Indiana 47906;
  • Universities Space Research Association (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Nutrition
Published
2014-07-17
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
377-400
ISSN
  • 0199-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4312
OpenAlex
W2149053785
Cited by
111
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
human spaceflight, bone mineral loss, bone resorption, calcium metabolism, bone mineral density, resistance training, vitamin D, International Space Station, bone strength
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Development, Bone Resorption, Calcium, Dietary, Humans, Models, Biological, Nutritional Status, Space Flight, Vitamin D, Weightlessness, Evidence-Based Medicine, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review