Cited by 537Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFolate and B Vitamins ResearchPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Association Between Maternal Use of Folic Acid Supplements and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children

Open access
Surén, Pål, Roth, Christine, Bresnahan, Michaeline, Haugen, Margaretha, Hornig, Mady, Hirtz, Deborah, Lie, Kari Kveim, Lipkin, W. Ian +7 more·2013·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Prenatal folic acid supplements reduce the risk of neural tube defects in children, but it has not been determined whether they protect against other neurodevelopmental disorders. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between maternal use of prenatal folic acid supplements and subsequent risk of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) (autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified [PDD-NOS]) in children. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The study sample of 85,176 children was derived from the population-based, prospective Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). The children were born in 2002-2008; by the end of follow-up on March 31, 2012, the age range was 3.3 through 10.2 years (mean, 6.4 years). The exposure of primary interest was use of folic acid from 4 weeks before to 8 weeks after the start of pregnancy, defined as the first day of the last menstrual period before conception. Relative risks of ASDs were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs in a logistic regression analysis. Analyses were adjusted for maternal education level, year of birth, and parity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Specialist-confirmed diagnosis of ASDs. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, 270 children in the study sample had been diagnosed with ASDs: 114 with autistic disorder, 56 with Asperger syndrome, and 100 with PDD-NOS. In children whose mothers took folic acid, 0.10% (64/61,042) had autistic disorder, compared with 0.21% (50/24,134) in those unexposed to folic acid. The adjusted OR for autistic disorder in children of folic acid users was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41-0.90). No association was found with Asperger syndrome or PDD-NOS, but power was limited. Similar analyses for prenatal fish oil supplements showed no such association with autistic disorder, even though fish oil use was associated with the same maternal characteristics as folic acid use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Use of prenatal folic acid supplements around the time of conception was associated with a lower risk of autistic disorder in the MoBa cohort. Although these findings cannot establish causality, they do support prenatal folic acid supplementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.155925

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surén, P., Roth, C., Bresnahan, M., Haugen, M., Hornig, M., Hirtz, D., Lie, K. K., Lipkin, W. I., Magnus, P., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Schjølberg, S., Smith, G. D., Øyen, A.-S., Susser, E., & Stoltenberg, C.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
309
Issue
6
Pages
570
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2113172416
Cited by
537
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 32
FWCI
35.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01es75558-11-0-1)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS047537, NS47537)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (N01 ES075558, N0-ES-75 558)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
folic acid supplementation, autism spectrum disorder, autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, pervasive developmental disorders, prenatal nutrition, maternal supplementation, neurodevelopmental disorders, fish oil supplements, Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study, parity, maternal age at conception, maternal smoking and alcohol use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, Male, Norway, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Care, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Regression Analysis, Risk, Vitamin B Complex, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review