CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,564Political Conflict and GovernanceMemory, violence, and historyTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

State Repression and Political Order

Davenport, Christian·2007·Annual Review of Political Science
DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

▪ Abstract State repression includes harassment, surveillance/spying, bans, arrests, torture, and mass killing by government agents and/or affiliates within their territorial jurisdiction. Over the past 40 years, the systematic study of state repression has grown considerably. The development of this work, however, has been uneven. Though unified in their focus on the problem of order (i.e., trying to ascertain how political authorities wield coercive power amid potential and actual domestic challengers), different scholars tend to emphasize distinct aspects of the topic. Consequently, a great deal of progress has been made in specific areas but others have lagged behind. In this review, I attempt to identify the dominant traditions in the repression literature, the core empirical findings, and some persisting puzzles.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1017/S0003055401003100 · DOI
  2. Aflatooni A, 1991, J. Polit. Milit. Sociol., 19, 29
  3. Ball P, 1996, Who Did What to Whom? Planning and Implementing a Large-Scale Human Rights Data Project
  4. Ball P, 1999, State Violence in Guatemala, 1960–1996: a Quantitative Reflection
  5. Davis D, 1995, Intranational political interactions (IPI)
  6. Duvall R, 1988, The Politics of Terrorism, 231
  7. Francisco R, 2000, European Protest and Coercion Data: Codebook
  8. Gibney M, 1996, Policy Stud. Dev. Nations, 4, 73
  9. Humphreys M, 2004, What the fighters say: a survey of ex-combatants in Sierra Leone
  10. King J, 1998, J. Polit. Mil. Sociol., 26, 191
  11. Restrepo J, 2004, Homo Oeconom., 21, 396
  12. Richards D, 1999, Soc. Sci. Q., 80, 648
  13. Rummel RJ, 1997, Power Kills
  14. Shellman S. 2007. Taking tactical turns: political survival and government-dissident sequential interactions. Sec. Stud. In press
  15. Zakaria F, 1997, For. Aff., 76, 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,564

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Davenport, C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Davenport, Christian
ORCID
Davenport, Christian
Venue
Annual Review of Political Science
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1577
DOI
10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216
OpenAlex
W2149047800
Cited by
1,564
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 189 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
state repression, political order, coercive power, surveillance, torture, mass murder, arrests, ban, political authority, state-society relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review