Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pheochromocytoma: An Imaging Chameleon

Blake, Michael A., Kalra, Mannudeep K., Maher, Michael M., Sahani, Dushyant V., Sweeney, Ann T., Mueller, Peter R., Hahn, Peter F., Boland, Giles W.·2004·RadioGraphics

Abstract

Pheochromocytomas are rare catecholamine-secreting tumors with many clinical and imaging manifestations. They may produce overwhelming cardiovascular crises if the diagnosis is not made or if appropriate treatment is delayed. It is thus important to recognize both their characteristic and atypical imaging appearances. Pheochromocytomas are encountered, sometimes unexpectedly, across a range of imaging modalities. They are characteristically solid, hypervascular masses with high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. A wide spectrum of imaging appearances is seen, however, and pheochromocytomas may mimic other adrenal lesions, both benign and malignant. They may be dark on T2-weighted MR images, in contrast to their more classic bright T2-weighted appearance. Other atypical features include fatty, hemorrhagic, cystic, and calcific changes. Pheochromocytomas may contain sufficient fat to be mistaken for an adenoma at computed tomography (CT) or MR imaging. They may also demonstrate rapid contrast material washout and be mistaken for an adenoma owing to their deenhancement profile; however, their washout pattern can be inconsistent. The appearance of pheochromocytomas at radionuclide imaging is also unpredictable. These characteristics at CT, MR imaging, and scintigraphy pose diagnostic challenges, since they allow pheochromocytomas to mimic many other adrenal masses. Pheochromocytoma is an important, often clinically occult neoplasm with devastating consequences if overlooked. Radiologists must be aware of the various forms that pheochromocytomas can assume at imaging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/rg.24si045506

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Blake, M. A., Kalra, M. K., Maher, M. M., Sahani, D. V., Sweeney, A. T., Mueller, P. R., Hahn, P. F., & Boland, G. W.
Venue
RadioGraphics
Published
2004-10
Volume
24
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S87-S99
ISSN
  • 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1323
OpenAlex
W2153360323
Cited by
339
References
29
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pheochromocytoma: An Imaging Chameleon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/rg.24si045506
The paper
Blake, M. A., Kalra, M. K., Maher, M. M., Sahani, D. V., Sweeney, A. T., Mueller, P. R., Hahn, P. F., & Boland, G. W. (2004). Pheochromocytoma: An Imaging Chameleon. RadioGraphics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.24si045506

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.