Cited by 500Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

A motor area rostral to the supplementary motor area (presupplementary motor area) in the monkey: Neuronal activity during a learned motor task

Matsuzaka, Y., Aizawa, H., Tanji, J.·1992·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The rostromesial agranular frontal cortex of macaque monkey (Macaca fuscata), traditionally defined as the supplementary motor area (SMA), was studied using various physiological techniques to delineate two different areas rostrocaudally. 2. Field and unitary responses to electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex were distinct in the caudal part, but minimal or absent in the rostral part. Intracortical microstimulation readily evoked limb or orofacial movements in the caudal part, but only infrequently in the rostral part. Neuronal responses to visual stimuli prevailed in the rostral part, but somatosensory responses were rare. The opposite was true in the caudal part. 3. The rostral part, roughly corresponding to area 6a beta, was operationally defined as the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA). The caudal part was redefined as the SMA proper. 4. Single-cell activity in the pre-SMA was quantitatively compared with that in the SMA proper in relation to a trained motor task. 5. Phasic responses to visual cue signals indicating the direction of forthcoming arm-reaching movement were more abundant in the pre-SMA. 6. Activity changes during the preparatory period, which lasted until the occurrence of the trigger signal for the reaching movement, were more frequent in the pre-SMA. 7. Phasic, movement-related activity was more frequent in the SMA, and its onset was often time locked to the movement onset. In the pre-SMA, the occurrences of response time locked to the movement-trigger signal were more frequent than in the SMA. 8. Among neurons in both areas, directional selectivity was found in all the cue, preparatory, and movement-related responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.653

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsuzaka, Y., Aizawa, H., & Tanji, J.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
653-662
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2253058536
Cited by
500
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
pre-supplementary motor area, supplementary motor area, macaque, primary motor cortex, single-unit activity, arm reaching, movement-related activity, preparatory period, direction selectivity, intracortical microstimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Arm, Cues, Electric Stimulation, Eye Movements, Female, Learning, Macaca, Male, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neurons, Sensation, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review