Cited by 534Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Selective Induction of LTP and LTD by Postsynaptic [Ca2+]i Elevation

Open access
Yang, Shao-Nian, Tang, Yun-Gui, Zucker, Robert S.·1999·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Selective Induction of LTP and LTD by Postsynaptic [Ca 2+]i Elevation. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), two prominent forms of synaptic plasticity at glutamatergic afferents to CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells, are both triggered by the elevation of postsynaptic intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca 2+]i). To understand how one signaling molecule can be responsible for triggering two opposing forms of synaptic modulation, different postsynaptic [Ca 2+]i elevation patterns were generated by a new caged calcium compound nitrophenyl-ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)- N, N, N′, N′-tetraacetic acid in CA1 pyramidal cells. We found that specific patterns of [Ca 2+]i elevation selectively activate LTP or LTD. In particular, only LTP was triggered by a brief increase of [Ca 2+]i with relatively high magnitude, which mimics the [Ca 2+]i rise during electrical stimulation typically used to induce LTP. In contrast, a prolonged modest rise of [Ca 2+]i reliably induced LTD. An important implication of the results is that both the amplitude and the duration of an intracellular chemical signal can carry significant biological information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.781

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitr-5 can evoke either an enhancement or a depression, depending on the amplitude and the duration of the Ca2+ signal.

    “Further studies showed that nitr-5 can evoke either an enhancement or a depression, depending on the amplitude and the duration of the Ca2+ signal (181).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [181]

    The Results section says earlier nitr-5 experiments produced either LTP (enhancement) or LTD (depression) after brief calcium elevations. But the paper attributes selective effects of calcium-signal amplitude and duration to its experiments with nitrophenyl-EGTA; it says nitr-5 could not produce a very high or prolonged calcium rise. Individual passage page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Brief large-amplitude signals favor potentiation, whereas more modest long-duration signals favor depression.

    “Brief large-amplitude signals favor potentiation, whereas more modest long-duration signals favor depression (181).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [181]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. BISHOP, C. M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
  2. ELLIS-DAVIES, G.C.R. AND KAPLAN, J. H. Nitrophenyl-EGTA, a photolabile chelator that selectively binds Ca 2ϩ with high affinity and releases it rapidly upon photolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 187-191, 1994.
  3. LISMAN, J. A mechanism for the Hebb and the anti-Hebb processes under- lying learning and memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 9574 -9578, 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S.-N., Tang, Y.-G., & Zucker, R. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
781-787
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1957331510
Cited by
534
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-15114, R01NS015114)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
long-term potentiation, long-term depression, postsynaptic calcium, intracellular calcium elevation, synaptic plasticity, CA1 pyramidal neurons, hippocampus, caged calcium, glutamatergic synapses
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Chelating Agents, Egtazic Acid, Hippocampus, Intracellular Fluid, Neuronal Plasticity, Photolysis, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review