Cited by 211Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pain-Related Fear: A Critical Review of the Related Measures

Open access
Lundberg, M., Grimby-Ekman, A., Verbunt, J., Simmonds, M. J.·2011·Pain Research and Treatment

Abstract

Objectives: In regards to pain-related fear, this study aimed to: (1) identify existing measures and review their measurement properties, and (2) identify the optimum measure for specific constructs of fear-avoidance, pain-related fear, fear of movement, and kinesiophobia. Design: Systematic literature search for instruments designed to measure fear of pain in patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain. Psychometric properties were evaluated by adjusted Wind criteria. Results: Five questionnaires (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Fear-Avoidance of Pain Scale (FAPS), Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ), Pain and Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS), and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)) were included in the review. The main findings were that for most questionnaires, there was no underlying conceptual model to support the questionnaire's construct. Psychometric properties were evaluated by diverse methods, which complicated comparisons of different versions of the same questionnaires. Construct validity and responsiveness was generally not supported and/or untested. Conclusion: The weak construct validity implies that no measure can currently identify who is fearful. The lack of evidence for responsiveness restricts the current use of the instruments to identify clinically relevant change from treatment. Finally, more theoretically driven research is needed to support the construct and thus the measurement of pain-related fear.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2011/494196

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kinesiophobia has been identified as a barrier to return to sport and a predictor of poor outcomes after ACL reconstruction in youth athletes.

    “Kinesiophobia, often described as pain-related fear, fear of movement, and/or fear of reinjury, has also been identified as a barrier to RTS and a predictor of poor outcomes after ACLR in youth athletes (Lundberg et al., 2011; DiSanti et al., 2018).”

    From The relationship between psychological readiness to return to sport and kinesiophobia in teens and young adults after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (2025) · cites this paper as Lundberg et al., 2011

    The Introduction defines kinesiophobia in terms of fear of movement and reinjury, and the References list a study titled “Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.” The review does not report that kinesiophobia predicts poor outcomes after ACL reconstruction in youth athletes; that population and predictive claim are unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 2000, Psychology and Health, 14, 1051, 10.1080/08870440008407366 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00265-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000173180.54261.0a · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.pain.2005.04.019 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/01.brs.0000256447.72623.56 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/aje/kwf136 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00174-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 1990, Pain Management, 3, 35
  10. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00279-N · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/BF01904905 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90113-P · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0149-2918(96)80054-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10926-005-1223-y · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF02310555 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/16501970600722403 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03232-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/026921550506072186 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0269215507077800 · DOI
  21. 10.1023/A:1026224805883 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00057-5 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00018 · DOI
  25. 10.1053/eujp.2000.0178 · DOI
  26. 2004, European Spine Journal, 13, 332
  27. 10.1007/s00586-007-0460-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.05.001 · DOI
  29. 10.1053/apmr.2001.22623 · DOI
  30. 10.1097/01.brs.0000193912.36742.4f · DOI
  31. 10.1300/J094v07n03_02 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3206283.x · DOI
  33. 10.1023/A:1018782831217 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00218-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00102-3 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.018 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/BF02109988 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/00002508-200403000-00007 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.355 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.016 · DOI
  41. 10.2340/16501977-0125 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/16501970510036411 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90113-P · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00034-8 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00049-6 · DOI
  46. 2001, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 8, 304, 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0804_5 · DOI
  47. 1999, Psychosomatics, 40, 529
  48. 2000, Attentional control of pain and the process of chronification, 129
  49. 2004, Spine, 29, E492, 10.1097/01.brs.0000143664.02702.0b · DOI
  50. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981230)17:24<2923::AID-SIM104>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  51. 10.1080/165019701300006542 · DOI
  52. 10.2340/16501977-0072 · DOI
  53. 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00007 · DOI
  54. 1988, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 579
  55. 2004, Assessment of fear and anxiety associated with pain: conceptualization, methods, and measures

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lundberg, M., Grimby-Ekman, A., Verbunt, J., & Simmonds, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Division of Occupational Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center and Research School CAPHRI, M D Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • A.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO 63501, USA
Venue
Pain Research and Treatment
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
2011
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 2090-1542 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-1550
OpenAlex
W2051121036
Cited by
211
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Research and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
fear of pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, kinesiophobia, psychometric properties, construct validity, responsiveness, chronic musculoskeletal pain, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review