Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Era of Genomic Medicine: A Narrative Review on CRISPR Technology as a Potential Therapeutic Tool for Human Diseases

Kotagama, Odatha W., Jayasinghe, Chanika D., Abeysinghe, Thelma·2019·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) provides acquired immunity in microorganisms against exogenous DNA that may hinder the survival of the organism. Pioneering work by Doudna and Charpentier in 2012 resulted in the creation of the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tool on the basis of this concept. The aim of this was to create a rapid, efficient, and versatile genome-editing tool to facilitate genetic manipulation. The mechanism relies on two components: the RNA guide which acts as a sentinel and a Cas protein complex which functions as a highly precise molecular knife. The guide RNA can be modified to match a DNA sequence of interest in the cell and accordingly be used to rectify mutations that may otherwise cause disease. Within a few years following the development of the CRISPR/Cas9 tool, its usage has become ubiquitous. Its influence extends into many fields of biological sciences from biotechnology and biochemistry to molecular biology and biomedical sciences. The following review aims at shedding some light on to the applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 tool in the field of biomedical sciences, particularly gene therapy. An insight with relation to a few of the many diseases that are being tackled with the aid of the CRISPR/Cas9 mechanism and the trends, successes, and challenges of this application as a gene therapy are discussed in this review.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2019/1369682

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. 10.1126/science.273.5281.1516 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nm.3793 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/hmg/ddn250 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/mt.2016.10 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/s13059-015-0859-y · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.1258096 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.4172/2155-9627.1000266 · DOI
  8. 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.1179555 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/hmg/ddv120 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1172/JCI72992 · DOI
  13. 10.1242/dev.115584 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/cr.2014.11 · DOI
  15. 2018, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 809, 81, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.002 · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007652 · DOI
  17. 10.1074/jbc.ra119.008422 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrg2842 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.1204094 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41467-018-05477-x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/s41587-019-0095-1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1126/science.aad5725 · DOI
  23. 2016, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 9
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.062 · DOI
  26. 2016, Blood, 128, 4703, 10.1182/blood.V128.22.4703.4703 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/srep12065 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.m116.719237 · DOI
  29. 10.5966/sctm.2015-0157 · DOI
  30. 10.1101/gr.173427.114 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1089/scd.2014.0347 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/hmg/ddw286 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.11.010 · DOI
  34. 10.1172/jci92087 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/ncomms7244 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.001 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.06.002 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nrg3849 · DOI
  40. 10.1183/09031936.00228013 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90156-x · DOI
  42. 10.1378/chest.10-2077 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30193-9 · DOI
  44. 10.1101/cshperspect.a011775 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199801)18:1<1::aid-pd209>3.3.co;2-p · DOI
  46. 10.1056/nejm198611133152006 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.02.003 · DOI
  48. 10.3390/ijms18040754 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/1097-4598(200010)23:10<1456::aid-mus2>3.3.co;2-k · DOI
  50. 10.1136/mp.55.2.127 · DOI
  51. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005234 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s10875-007-9160-5 · DOI
  53. 10.1186/1476-7961-9-10 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/jpids/piy011 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(199902)21:2<164::aid-bies10>3.3.co;2-w · DOI
  56. 10.1155/2014/612823 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/nature13589 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.18632/oncotarget.6392 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/jor.22745 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.002 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.046 · DOI
  62. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152820 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s11248-018-0074-1 · DOI
  64. 10.1538/expanim.17-0123 · DOI
  65. 2017, Circulation, 136
  66. 10.1161/circresaha.115.304351 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1161/circulationaha.117.031335 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.18632/oncotarget.17154 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1993.tb01666.x · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.09.002 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/nrc3950 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.18632/oncotarget.13148 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/nbt.3235 · DOI
  74. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.2337/diacare.20.2.219 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.06.016 · DOI
  77. 10.1161/CIR.000000000000048584 · DOI
  78. 10.1161/atvbaha.116.304790 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.177 · DOI
  80. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00240 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1038/nbt.3149 · DOI
  83. 1998, Journal of Virology, 72, 9873, 10.1128/JVI.72.12.9873-9880.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1038/nbt.3198 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1038/nbt.3439 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.03.008 · DOI
  88. 10.1089/crispr.2019.0001 · DOI
  89. 10.1080/21655979.2017.1282018 · DOI
  90. 2019, The FASEB Journal, 33, 620

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Kotagama, O. W., Jayasinghe, C. D., & Abeysinghe, T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Nawala, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
  • Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Nawala, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-07
Volume
2019
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
Cited by
48
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review