Cited by 27PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

mTOR Inhibition Mitigates Enhanced mRNA Translation Associated with the Metastatic Phenotype of Osteosarcoma Cells In Vivo

Open access
Morrow, James J., Mendoza, Arnulfo, Koyen, Allyson, Lizardo, Michael M., Ren, Ling, Waybright, Timothy J., Hansen, Ryan J., Gustafson, Daniel L. +4 more·2016·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: To successfully metastasize, tumor cells must respond appropriately to biological stressors encountered during metastatic progression. We sought to test the hypothesis that enhanced efficiency of mRNA translation during periods of metastatic stress is required for metastatic competence of osteosarcoma and that this metastasis-specific adaptation is amenable to therapeutic intervention. Experimental Design: We employ novel reporter and proteomic systems that enable tracking of mRNA translation efficiency and output in metastatic osteosarcoma cells as they colonize the lungs. We test the potential to target mRNA translation as an antimetastatic therapeutic strategy through pharmacokinetic studies and preclinical assessment of the prototypic mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, across multiple models of metastasis. Results: Metastatic osteosarcoma cells translate mRNA more efficiently than nonmetastatic cells during critical stressful periods of metastatic colonization of the lung. Rapamycin inhibits translational output during periods of metastatic stress, mitigates lung colonization, and prolongs survival. mTOR-inhibiting exposures of rapamycin are achievable in mice using treatment schedules that correspond to human doses well below the MTDs defined in human patients, and as such are very likely to be tolerated over long exposures alone and in combination with other agents. Conclusions: Metastatic competence of osteosarcoma cells is dependent on efficient mRNA translation during stressful periods of metastatic progression, and the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, can mitigate this translation and inhibit metastasis in vivo. Our data suggest that mTOR pathway inhibitors should be reconsidered in the clinic using rationally designed dosing schedules and clinical metrics related to metastatic progression. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6129–41. ©2016 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0326

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ex vivo techniques have been adapted to study tumour-host interactions, screen for metastasis-related vulnerabilities, and validate hits from other screens.

    “These techniques have been adapted to study tumour-host interactions, to screen for metastasis-related vulnerabilities and to validate hits identified in other screens 74,75,92,216,217,218,219 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [218]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrow, J. J., Mendoza, A., Koyen, A., Lizardo, M. M., Ren, L., Waybright, T. J., Hansen, R. J., Gustafson, D. L., Zhou, M., Fan, T. M., Scacheri, P. C., & Khanna, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Khanna, Chand
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2016-12-15
Volume
22
Issue
24
Pages
6129-6141
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2470037984
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (CA186633 and GM007250, #15335, R01CA160356 and 1R01CA193677, P30CA046934)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
osteosarcoma, metastasis, mTOR inhibition, rapamycin, mRNA translation, translational regulation, lung colonization, anti-metastatic therapy, dosing regimen, pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Nude, Phenotype, RNA, Messenger, Osteosarcoma, Signal Transduction, Mice, SCID, Apoptosis, Sirolimus, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Proteomics, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review