Cited by 415Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRD4 Connects Enhancer Remodeling to Senescence Immune Surveillance

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Oncogene-induced senescence is a potent barrier to tumorigenesis that limits cellular expansion following certain oncogenic events. Senescent cells display a repressive chromatin configuration thought to stably silence proliferation-promoting genes while simultaneously activating an unusual form of immune surveillance involving a secretory program referred to as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Here, we demonstrate that senescence also involves a global remodeling of the enhancer landscape with recruitment of the chromatin reader BRD4 to newly activated super-enhancers adjacent to key SASP genes. Transcriptional profiling and functional studies indicate that BRD4 is required for the SASP and downstream paracrine signaling. Consequently, BRD4 inhibition disrupts immune cell–mediated targeting and elimination of premalignant senescent cells in vitro and in vivo. Our results identify a critical role for BRD4-bound super-enhancers in senescence immune surveillance and in the proper execution of a tumor-suppressive program. Significance: This study reveals how cells undergoing oncogene-induced senescence acquire a distinctive enhancer landscape that includes formation of super-enhancers adjacent to immune-modulatory genes required for paracrine immune activation. This process links BRD4 and super-enhancers to a tumor-suppressive immune surveillance program that can be disrupted by small molecule inhibitors of the bromo and extra terminal domain family of proteins. Cancer Discov; 6(6); 612–29. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Vizioli and Adams, p. 576. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 561

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-0217

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Tasdemir, N., Banito, A., Roe, J.-S., Alonso-Curbelo, D., Camiolo, M., Tschaharganeh, D. F., Huang, C.-H., Aksoy, O., Bolden, J. E., Chen, C.-C., Fennell, M., Thapar, V., Chicas, A., Vakoc, C. R., & Lowe, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
  • 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vakoc, Christopher R.
  • Lowe, Scott W.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
612-629
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2342055991
Cited by
415
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 8
FWCI
24.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od020122-01, 5p30ca045508-35)
  • National Institute on Aging (R56AG016379, R01AG016379)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30-CA045508, R01CA174793, P01CA013106, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
BRD4, super-enhancers, enhancer remodeling, oncogene-induced senescence, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, chromatin reader proteins, paracrine signaling, tumor suppression, senescent cell elimination
MeSH terms
Bromodomain Containing Proteins, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Cycle, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Fibroblasts, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Humans, Immunologic Surveillance, Membrane Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Oncogenes, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors, Cluster Analysis, Cellular Senescence, Cell Cycle Proteins, Computational Biology, Paracrine Communication, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Gene Expression Profiling, Hepatocytes, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Cell Line, Tumor, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Position-Specific Scoring Matrices, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Nucleotide Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review