Cited by 377Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Education, activity, health, blood pressure and apolipoprotein E as predictors of cognitive change in old age: A review

Anstey, Kaarin, Christensen, Helen·2000·Gerontology

Abstract

Background: Cross-sectional studies have identified a number of health and lifestyle factors that correlate with cognitive function in old age. It is important to know whether these factors also predict change in cognitive function over time. Objective: To evaluate published findings on genetic, health and lifestyle predictors of cognitive change in late adulthood. Methods: Studies reporting data on education, health, blood pressure, activity and apolipoprotein E (APOE) as predictors of cognitive change were reviewed. A total of 34 studies were identified that reported data on these predictors. The average follow-up period of studies reviewed was 7.68 years. Results: Results showed that education, hypertension, objective indices of health and cardiovascular disease, and APOE were associated with cognitive change. Results regarding the effect of physical activity on cognitive change were inconclusive. Conclusion: Despite the lack of data on some predictors, the longitudinal trends are generally consistent with cross-sectional findings on predictors of cognitive performance in old age. More research is required to compare the influence of predictors on different types of cognitive abilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000022153

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anstey, K., & Christensen, H.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2000
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
163-177
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W1973104713
Cited by
377
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 25
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive change, old age, education, hypertension, blood pressure, physical activity, apolipoprotein E, cardiovascular disease, health status, cognitive aging, predictors of cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Apolipoproteins E, Australia, Blood Pressure, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cognition Disorders, Educational Status, Female, Health Status, Humans, Life Style, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review