CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual Variation in Coping with Stress: A Multidimensional Approach of Ultimate and Proximate Mechanisms

Koolhaas, Jaap M., de Boer, Sietse F., Buwalda, Bauke, van Reenen, Kees·2007·Brain, Behavior and Evolution
DOI 10.1159/000105485
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ecological studies on feral populations of mice, fish and birds elucidate the functional significance of phenotypes that differ individually in their behavioral and neuroendocrine response to environmental challenge. Within a species, the capacity to cope with environmental challenges largely determines individual survival in the natural habitat. Recent studies indicate that individual variation within a species may buffer the species for strong fluctuations in the natural habitat. A conceptual framework will be presented that is based on the view that individual variation in aggressive behavior can be considered more generally as a variation in actively coping with environmental challenges. Highly aggressive individuals adopt a proactive coping style whereas low levels of aggression indicate a more passive or reactive style of coping. Coping styles have now been identified in a range of species and can be considered as trait characteristics that are stable over time and across situations. The dimension of coping style seems to be independent of an emotionality dimension. Hence, in the analysis of the proximate mechanisms of stress and adaptation, one has to consider the possibility that the mechanisms which determine the type of stress response might be independent from those underlying the magnitude of the response. The two coping styles differ in a number of important neurobiological and neuroendocrine systems. For example, proactive males differ significantly from reactive males in the homeostatic control of serotonergic activity resulting in completely opposite dose response relationships of various serotonergic drugs. The results so far show that proactive coping is characterized by a strong inhibitory control of the 5-HT neuron via its somatodendritic 5-HT 1A autoreceptor. It is hypothesized that the regulation of serotonin release is causally related to coping style rather than emotionality. Understanding the functional individual variation as it occurs in nature and the underlying neurobiology and neuroendocrinology is fundamental in understanding individual vulnerability to stress related disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000105485

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016%2F0014-2999%2895%2900782-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1016%2FS0166-4328%2805%2980072-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1890%2F0012-9658%281998%29079%5B1479%3APCISMT%5D2.0.CO%3B2 · DOI
  4. 10.1016%2F0361-9230%2893%2990164-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1016%2Fj.physbeh.2006.11.010 · DOI
  6. 10.1016%2F0361-9230%2893%2990032-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016%2FS0924-977X%2896%2900391-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1016%2FS0014-2999%2803%2901278-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1016%2Fj.ejphar.2005.09.065 · DOI
  10. 10.1016%2F0091-3057%2891%2990282-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1098%2Frspb.2004.2680 · DOI
  12. 10.1098%2Frspb.2002.2168 · DOI
  13. 10.1016%2F0091-3057%2895%2902005-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1016%2FS0079-6123%2808%2961586-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016%2F0031-9384%2892%2990284-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1016%2Fj.conb.2003.10.003 · DOI
  17. 10.1016%2Fj.pnpbp.2005.03.012 · DOI
  18. 10.1002%2F1099-0798%28200010%2918%3A5%3C581%3A%3AAID-BSL411%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L · DOI
  19. 10.1007%2Fs00213-002-1139-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1159%2F000006627 · DOI
  21. 10.1016%2FS0149-7634%2899%2900029-9 · DOI
  22. 10.1016%2F0006-8993%2892%2991529-N · DOI
  23. 10.1016%2Fj.tree.2006.03.018 · DOI
  24. 10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2896%2900229-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1016%2Fj.neubiorev.2004.07.001 · DOI
  26. 10.1086%2F422893 · DOI
  27. 10.1016%2F0006-8993%2894%2990068-X · DOI
  28. 10.1007%2FBF02359756 · DOI
  29. 10.1023%2FA%3A1021448713665 · DOI
  30. 10.1086%2F432139 · DOI
  31. 10.1016%2FS0031-9384%2801%2900565-0 · DOI
  32. 10.1016%2Fj.applanim.2003.09.007 · DOI
  33. 10.1016%2Fj.physbeh.2005.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.3168%2Fjds.S0022-0302%2802%2974338-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1007%2Fs00213-004-2005-5 · DOI
  36. 10.1196%2Fannals.1296.030 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016%2FS0018-506X%2802%2900013-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1016%2Fj.yhbeh.2006.07.004 · DOI
  39. 10.1006%2Fanbe.1994.1344 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Koolhaas, J. M., de Boer, S. F., Buwalda, B., & van Reenen, K.
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2007
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
218-226
ISSN
  • 0006-8977
  • 1421-9743
DOI
10.1159/000105485
Cited by
382
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review