Cited by 49Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInfant Health and Development

The Role of Pathogenic Microbes and Commensal Bacteria in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Collins, Stephen, Verdu, Elena, Denou, Emmanuel, Bercik, Premsyl·2009·Digestive Diseases

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) reflects several pathogenetic entities including a subgroup with low-grade colonic inflammation. We propose that pathogenic bacteria act as triggers and that disturbances of commensal bacteria maintain low-grade inflammation, that in turn leads to dysfunction in the gut or brain. Methods: Studies were performed in mice under specific pathogen-free conditions. Visceral pain was assessed by the visceromotor response and motility was assessed by in vivo fluoroscopy and in vitro by muscle contractility. Brain chemistry was assessed by in situ hybridization and behavior by standard tests. The microbiota was monitored using 16s-based RT-PCR and DGGE. Results: Mice transiently infected with the nematode Trichinella spiralis exhibited changes in motility and in visceral perception that persisted for up to 6 weeks post-infection. This was accompanied by alterations in the microbiota and an upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2 which could be reversed by treatment with anti-inflammatory agents or selected probiotics. To investigate the contribution of the microbiota, we treated mice with oral antibiotics and monitored visceral perception and behavior. Antibiotic therapy produced substantial changes in the microbiota, a small increment in inflammatory activity and an increase in substance P or pain perception. Oral, but not systemic antibiotic treatment, produced changes in brain chemistry and an increase in anxiety-like behavior. Conclusion: These studies provide proof of concept that pathogenic microbes can induce persistent gut dysfunction and that changes in microbial composition of the gut can maintain gut dysfunction as well as induce behavioral changes reminiscent of the psychiatric comorbidity that occurs in up to 60% of irritable bowel syndrome patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000268126

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, S., Verdu, E., Denou, E., & Bercik, P.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Venue
Digestive Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
27
Issue
Suppl. 1
Pages
85-89
ISSN
  • 0257-2753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9875
OpenAlex
W2135376767
Cited by
49
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, gut microbiota, commensal bacteria, pathogenic bacteria, Trichinella spiralis, visceral pain, intestinal motility, cyclooxygenase-2, anxiety-like behavior, substance P, psychiatric comorbidity, antibiotic therapy, gut-brain axis
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Humans, Gastrointestinal Tract, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review