Cited by 26Treatment of Major DepressionEpigenetics and DNA MethylationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Therapeutic response to paroxetine in major depressive disorder predicted by DNA Methylation

Takeuchi, Naohiro, Nonen, Shinpei, Kato, Masaki, Wakeno, Masataka, Takekita, Yoshiteru, Kinoshita, Toshihiko, Kugawa, Fumihiko·2017·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants have variable therapeutic effects, depending on genetic and environmental factors. Approximately 30% of major depressive disorder (MDD) patients do not respond significantly to antidepressants such as paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). However, the biological mechanisms behind this phenomenon are mostly unknown. Here, we examined the role of patients' epigenetic background in SSRI efficacy. METHODS: Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of the peripheral blood of Japanese MDD patients was performed by using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. RESULTS: We compared the results of the 10 patients who best responded to paroxetine (BR) with the 10 worst responders (WR), and found 623 CpG sites with a >10% difference in DNA methylation level. Among them, 218 sites were nominally significant between BR and WR (p < 0.05), and 2 sites (cg00594917 and cg07260927) were significantly different after false discovery rate (FDR) correction (q < 0.05). The methylation difference was greatest at cg00594917, located in the first exon of the PPFIA4 gene, which codes for liprin-α (p = 0.00012). Hierarchical cluster analysis of 23 CpG sites in the PPFIA4 gene distinguished BR and WR, except for 1 WR patient. The cg07260927 site was located in the 5'UTR of the heparin sulfate-glucosamine 3-sulfotransferase 1 (HS3ST1) gene (p = 0.00013). Hierarchical cluster analysis of 28 CpG sites in HS3ST1 distinguished BR and WR, except for 1 WR and 2 BR patients. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients' DNA methylation profile at specific genes such as PPFIA4 and HS3ST1 is associated with individual variations in therapeutic responses to paroxetine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000480512

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takeuchi, N., Nonen, S., Kato, M., Wakeno, M., Takekita, Y., Kinoshita, T., & Kugawa, F.
Affiliations
  • Hyogo University of Health Sciences (JP)
  • Kansai Medical University (JP)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
81-88
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2765970627
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K09813)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
major depressive disorder, paroxetine, antidepressant response, DNA methylation, epigenetics, Liprin-α, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, treatment resistance, CpG sites, peripheral blood
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sulfotransferases, Cluster Analysis, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review