Cited by 22Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Patient and therapist expectations for a blended cognitive behavioral therapy program for depression: qualitative exploratory study

Open access
Atik, Ece, Schückes, Magnus, Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer·2022·JMIR Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blended cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT)-the combination of digital elements and face-to-face psychotherapy-has been proposed to alleviate challenges that patients and therapists face in conventional cognitive behavioral therapy. There is growing evidence that adding digital elements to face-to-face psychotherapy can contribute to better treatment outcomes. However, bCBT programs still show considerable shortcomings, and knowledge on how to improve digital apps using a bCBT protocol is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to inductively identify functions and qualities that are expected from a bCBT treatment for depression in the eyes of patients and psychotherapists who were not currently receiving or practicing bCBT treatment. METHODS: We used a qualitative exploratory study design and conducted 3 focus group interviews (n=6 in each) and 5 semistructured in-depth interviews with therapists as well as 11 individual interviews with patients with a primary diagnosis of depression and currently undergoing cognitive behavioral therapy treatment in Germany. Themes and categories were established inductively from transcribed interview records based on a rigorous coding method. RESULTS: Both therapists and patients expected a digital app to provide patients with the opportunity to track their mood, work on therapeutic homework activities, easily access an intervention set for harder moments, and efficiently facilitate administrative tasks. The desire to be able to customize bCBT protocols to individual patient circumstances was evident in both patient and therapist interviews. Patients differed with respect to what content and the amount of material the app should focus on as well as the method of recording experiences. Therapists viewed digital apps as potentially aiding in their documentation work outside of sessions. Different attitudes surfaced on the topic of data security, with patients not as concerned as therapists. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients and therapists had substantially positive attitudes toward the option of an integrated bCBT treatment. Our study presents novel findings on the expectations and attitudes of patients and therapists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/36806

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark indicate that blended care was acceptable to CBT-based therapists and psychologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Findings from Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark indicate that blended care was acceptable to CBT-based therapists and psychologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic [28-31].”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results (Therapist Interviews; page unavailable) say the CBT-oriented therapists interviewed in Germany were open to using a blended CBT program. The Methods (Ethics Approval; page unavailable) date those interviews to February–May 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper does not provide findings from the Netherlands or Denmark, or from before the pandemic; those parts of the multi-citation claim are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adequate training and minimizing the time burden of DMHI use with clients is important to European mental health professionals.

    “Adequate training and minimizing the time burden of DMHI use with clients is also important to European mental health professionals [283138-40undefinedundefined].”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results > Therapist Interviews section (page not provided) says therapists wanted apps to ease organizational work and preserve limited session time, supporting the time-burden part of the claim. It does not report that adequate training was important to them, and findings from the interviewed therapists do not establish a preference among European mental health professionals generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The European research suggests that blended care is scalable and could enhance mental health professionals' acceptance of DMHI use in routine care, as well as improve client engagement by increasing DMHI uptake and adherence.

    “The European research suggests that blended care is scalable and could enhance mental health professionals’ acceptance of DMHI use in routine care, as well as improve client engagement by increasing DMHI uptake and adherence.”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results (Therapist Interviews; page not provided) describe therapists as open to blended CBT apps, and the Discussion (Principal Findings; page not provided) says patients and therapists were eager to try an app that might help with homework adherence. The paper does not establish that blended care is scalable or that it increases professionals’ acceptance in routine care, DMHI uptake, or adherence to the digital intervention itself. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Qualitative research by Atik and colleagues on blended care found that clients were not concerned about sharing personal data within a DMHI, provided their data were used only for treatment purposes.

    “Despite this, the data sharing findings align with qualitative research by Atik and colleagues [28] on blended care, who found that clients were not concerned about sharing personal data within a DMHI, provided their data were used only for treatment purposes.”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results (Patient Interviews, “Sharing of Therapy-Related Data”) say patients were generally willing to share personal data through the app and were not greatly concerned about doing so. But the stated conditions for sharing with app providers were that data be anonymous, secure, and not used for other purposes; the paper also discusses sharing to improve the program, so it does not establish a treatment-only condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tailored interventions seem to be a prerequisite to increasing university students' intention to use mental health services because one-size-fits-all approaches are unlikely to be effective for everyone.

    “Tailored interventions also seem to be a prerequisite to increasing university students’ intention to use mental health services because one-size-fits-all approaches are unlikely to be effective for everyone [37,38].”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of a Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety Based on Experiences of University Students: Qualitative Interview Study (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results (Patient Interviews; page unavailable) report that patients wanted a digital app tailored to individual needs. The Discussion (Principal Findings; page unavailable) also argues against giving different patients identical intervention content. But this study interviewed patients receiving psychotherapy for depression, not university students, and did not establish that tailoring is a prerequisite for increasing students’ intention to use mental health services. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [47]Corbin J Strauss A Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th edition 2014 Thousand Oaks, CA, USA Sage Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atik, E., Schückes, M., & Apolinário-Hagen, J.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Schückes, Magnus
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2022-12-30
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
e36806
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313364247
Cited by
22
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
depression, mental health apps, patient expectations, therapist expectations, mood tracking, data security, treatment documentation, personalized treatment protocols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review