Cited by 219Treatment of Major DepressionPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Are Psychological and Pharmacologic Interventions Equally Effective in the Treatment of Adult Depressive Disorders?: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Cuijpers, Pim, van Straten, Annemieke, van Oppen, Patricia, Andersson, Gerhard·2008·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A large number of studies suggest that both psychological and pharmacologic therapies are effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate depressive disorders. Whether both types of intervention are equally effective has not been established definitively. DATA SOURCES: A database was developed through a comprehensive literature search (from 1966 to May 2007) in which 6947 abstracts in PubMed (1244 abstracts), PsycINFO (1736), EMBASE (1911), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2056) were examined. Abstracts were identified by combining terms indicative of psychological treatment and depression (both MeSH terms and text words). For this database, the primary studies from 22 meta-analyses of psychological treatment for depression were also collected. STUDY SELECTION: For the current study, the abstracts of 832 studies were examined. DATA EXTRACTION: Thirty randomized trials were included in a meta-analysis that compared the effects of a psychological treatment for 3178 adults with a diagnosed depressive disorder (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, minor depressive disorder) with the effects of a pharmacologic treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: In studies of patients with dysthymia, pharmacotherapy was significantly more effective than psychotherapy (d = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.47 to -0.10). In patients with major depressive disorder, treatments with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were significantly more effective than psychological treatments, while treatment with other antidepressants did not differ significantly. Subgroup and metaregression analyses did not show that pretest severity of depressive symptoms was associated with differential effects of psychological and pharmacologic treatments of major depressive disorder. Dropout rates were smaller in psychological interventions compared with pharmacologic treatments (odds ratio = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacologic treatments may be more effective than psychological interventions in the treatment of dysthymia. Pharmacologic treatment with SSRIs may also be more effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder, although these differences are small and probably have little meaning from a clinical point of view. We can conclude that both psychological and pharmacologic therapies are effective in the treatment of depressive disorders and that each has its own merits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v69n1102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., van Oppen, P., & Andersson, G.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2008-11-30
Volume
69
Issue
11
Pages
1675-1685
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986628810
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depressive disorders, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, minor depressive disorder, psychotherapy, antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, treatment effectiveness comparison, dropout rates, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Regression Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Dysthymic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review