Cited by 211Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Genetic Risk Score Is Associated With Incident Cardiovascular Disease and Coronary Artery Calcium: The Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Thanassoulis, George, Peloso, Gina M., Pencina, Michael J., Hoffmann, Udo, Fox, Caroline S., Cupples, L. Adrienne, Levy, Daniel, D'Agostino, Ralph B., Hwang, Shih-Jen, O'Donnell, Christopher J.·2012·Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics

Abstract

Background—: Limited data exist regarding the use of a genetic risk score (GRS) for predicting risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in US-based samples. Methods and Results—: By using findings from recent genome-wide association studies, we constructed GRSs composed of 13 genetic variants associated with myocardial infarction or other manifestations of coronary heart disease (CHD) and 102 genetic variants associated with CHD or its major risk factors. We also updated the 13 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) GRSs with 16 SNPs recently discovered by genome-wide association studies. We estimated the association, discrimination, and risk reclassification of each GRS for incident cardiovascular events and prevalent coronary artery calcium (CAC). In analyses adjusted for age, sex, CVD risk factors, and parental history of CVD, the 13 SNP GRSs were significantly associated with incident hard CHD (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00–1.15; P =0.04), CVD (hazard ratio per allele, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.09; P =0.03), and high CAC (defined as >75 th age- and sex-specific percentile; odds ratio per allele, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11–1.26; P =3.4×10 −7 ). The GRS did not improve discrimination for incident CHD or CVD but led to modest improvements in risk reclassification. However, significant improvements in discrimination and risk reclassification were observed for the prediction of high CAC. The addition of 16 newly discovered SNPs to the 13 SNP GRSs did not significantly modify these results. Conclusions—: A GRS composed of 13 SNPs associated with coronary disease is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and of high CAC, modestly improves risk reclassification for incident CHD, and significantly improves discrimination for high CAC. The addition of recently discovered SNPs did not significantly improve the performance of this GRS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circgenetics.111.961342

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Thanassoulis, G., Peloso, G. M., Pencina, M. J., Hoffmann, U., Fox, C. S., Cupples, L. A., Levy, D., D'Agostino, R. B., Hwang, S.-J., & O'Donnell, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • From the Division of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (G.T.); National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA (G.T., G.M.P., M.J.P., C.S.F., L.A.C., D.L., R.B.D.'A., S.-J.H., C.J.O.); School of Medicine (G.T.) and Department of Mathematics (M.J.P., R.B.D.'A.), Boston University, Boston, MA; Center for Population Studies, NHLBI...
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics
Published
2012-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
113-121
ISSN
  • 1942-325X (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-3268
OpenAlex
W2135313485
Cited by
211
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 18
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 HL999999, n01hc25195-41-0-1, n02hl64278-6-0-0)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195, ZIAHL006002, N02- HL-64278, N01-HC-025195, Z01HL006002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
polygenic risk score, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery calcium, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, single nucleotide polymorphisms, risk reclassification, discrimination (statistics), incident cardiovascular events, genetic variants
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Calcinosis, Calcium, Coronary Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Coronary Angiography, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review