Cited by 299Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

C-Reactive Protein and Reclassification of Cardiovascular Risk in the Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Wilson, Peter W.F., Pencina, Michael, Jacques, Paul, Selhub, Jacob, D'Agostino, Ralph, O'Donnell, Christopher J.·2008·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background— The relationship of circulating levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, particularly with consideration of effects at intermediate levels of risk, has not been fully assessed. Methods and Results— Among 3006 offspring participants in the Framingham Heart Study free of CVD (mean age, 46 years at baseline), there were 129 hard coronary heart disease (CHD) events and 286 total CVD events during 12 years of follow-up. Cox regression, discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and net reclassification improvement were used to assess the role of CRP on vascular risk. In an age-adjusted model that included both sexes, the hazard ratios for new hard CHD and total CVD were significantly associated with higher CRP levels. Similar analyses according to increasing homocysteine level showed significant protective associations for hard CHD but not for total CVD. In multivariable analyses that included age, sex, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, current smoking, hypertension treatment, and homocysteine, the log CRP level remained significantly related to development of hard CHD and total CVD and provided moderate improvement in the discrimination of events. The net reclassification improvement when CRP was added to traditional factors was 5.6% for total CVD ( P =0.014) and 11.8% for hard CHD ( P =0.009). Conclusions— Circulating levels of CRP help to estimate risk for initial cardiovascular events and may be used most effectively in persons at intermediate risk for vascular events, offering moderate improvement in reclassification of risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.108.831198

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many risk factors other than those in available risk functions have been identified, but their contribution to absolute cardiovascular risk estimation in individual patients is generally modest.

    “It should be stressed, however, that although many risk factors other than the few included in the available risk functions have been identified [such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and homocysteine levels], their contribution to absolute cardiovascular risk estimations of individual patients (in addition to traditional risk factors) is generally modest.66”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Assmann G Schulte H Oberwittler W Fidge NH Nestel PJ New aspects in the prediction of coronary artery disease: The Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study Atherosclerosis VII 1986 Amsterdam Elsevier 19 24

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, P. W. F., Pencina, M., Jacques, P., Selhub, J., D'Agostino, R., & O'Donnell, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • From EPICORE (P.W.F.W.), Emory University School of Medicine, and the Atlanta VAMC Epidemiology and Genetics Section, Atlanta, Ga; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (C.J.O.D.); National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study (M.P., R.D.A., C.J.O.D.), Framingham Mass; Department of Mathematics (M.P., R.D.A.), Boston University, Boston, Mass; Tufts USDA Nutrition Center (P.J., J.S.), Boston, Mass.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2008-11
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
92-97
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2144684988
Cited by
299
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 36
FWCI
29.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, Boston University
  • Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL073272, N01‐HC25195, N01-HC-025195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
C-reactive protein, cardiovascular risk reclassification, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, intermediate cardiovascular risk, homocysteine, risk prediction, net reclassification improvement
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Coronary Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Homocysteine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Prevalence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review