Cited by 61Protein Degradation and InhibitorsCongenital heart defects researchCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

BRD4 (Bromodomain-Containing Protein 4) Interacts with GATA4 (GATA Binding Protein 4) to Govern Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Adult Cardiomyocytes

Open access
Padmanabhan, Arun, Alexanian, Michael, Linares-Saldana, Ricardo, González-Terán, Bárbara, Andreoletti, Gaia, Huang, Yu, Connolly, Andrew J., Kim, Wonho +11 more·2020·Circulation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Gene regulatory networks control tissue homeostasis and disease progression in a cell type–specific manner. Ubiquitously expressed chromatin regulators modulate these networks, yet the mechanisms governing how tissue specificity of their function is achieved are poorly understood. BRD4 (bromodomain-containing protein 4), a member of the BET (bromo- and extraterminal domain) family of ubiquitously expressed acetyl-lysine reader proteins, plays a pivotal role as a coactivator of enhancer signaling across diverse tissue types in both health and disease and has been implicated as a pharmacological target in heart failure. However, the cell-specific role of BRD4 in adult cardiomyocytes remains unknown. Methods: We combined conditional mouse genetics, unbiased transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses, and classic molecular biology and biochemical approaches to understand the mechanism by which BRD4 in adult cardiomyocyte homeostasis. Results: Here, we show that cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of Brd4 in adult mice leads to acute deterioration of cardiac contractile function with mutant animals demonstrating a transcriptomic signature characterized by decreased expression of genes critical for mitochondrial energy production. Genome-wide occupancy data show that BRD4 enriches at many downregulated genes (including the master coactivators Ppargc1a, Ppargc1b , and their downstream targets) and preferentially colocalizes with GATA4 (GATA binding protein 4), a lineage-determining cardiac transcription factor not previously implicated in regulation of adult cardiac metabolism. BRD4 and GATA4 form an endogenous complex in cardiomyocytes and interact in a bromodomain-independent manner, revealing a new functional interaction partner for BRD4 that can direct its locus and tissue specificity. Conclusions: These results highlight a novel role for a BRD4-GATA4 module in cooperative regulation of a cardiomyocyte-specific gene program governing bioenergetic homeostasis in the adult heart.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.120.047753

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • JQ1-associated transcriptional changes in cardiomyocytes are modest compared with other cardiac cell populations.

    “Given our observation that transcriptional changes associated with JQ1 in the cardiomyocyte (CM) compartment are modest compared to other cardiac cell populations4,11”

    From Chromatin remodelling drives immune cell–fibroblast communication in heart failure (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results section reports that JQ1-treated sham-operated mouse hearts showed no dramatic transcriptional changes. The Discussion suggests that JQ1’s dominant targets in heart failure may be non-cardiomyocytes, but the paper does not directly compare JQ1-associated transcriptional changes in cardiomyocytes with those in other cardiac cell populations. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padmanabhan, A., Alexanian, M., Linares-Saldana, R., González-Terán, B., Andreoletti, G., Huang, Y., Connolly, A. J., Kim, W., Hsu, A., Duan, Q., Winchester, S. A. B., Felix, F., Perez-Bermejo, J. A., Wang, Q., Li, L., Shah, P. P., Haldar, S. M., Jain, R., & Srivastava, D.
Affiliations
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
  • Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, San Francisco, CA (A.P., M.A., B.G.-T., Y.H., A.H., Q.D., S.A.B.W., F.F., J.A.P.-B., S.M.H., D.S.).
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Padmanabhan, Arun
  • Alexanian, Michael
  • Linares-Saldana, Ricardo
  • Jain, Rajan
  • Srivastava, Deepak
Venue
Circulation
Published
2020-12-15
Volume
142
Issue
24
Pages
2338-2355
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W3093674907
Cited by
60
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1548571)
  • American Heart Association
  • A.P. Giannini Foundation
  • Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program
  • Gilead Sciences
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Gladstone Institutes
  • Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics
  • Roddenberry Foundation
  • Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation
  • Gilead Research Scholars
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (186704)
  • National Institutes of Health (1c06rr018928-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL139783, P01HL146366, P01HL089707, R01HL127240, F31HL147416, R01HL057181)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06-RR-018928)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
BRD4, GATA4, bromodomain proteins, BET proteins, cardiomyocytes, mitochondrial homeostasis, myocardial metabolism, PPARγ coactivator, PGC-1α, PPARGC1B, tissue-specific gene regulation, cardiac contractile function, heart failure
MeSH terms
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha, Bromodomain Containing Proteins, Animals, Energy Metabolism, Gene Expression Regulation, Genotype, Homeostasis, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mitochondria, Heart, Nuclear Proteins, Phenotype, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors, Ventricular Function, Left, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Knockout, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Gene Expression Profiling, Myocytes, Cardiac, GATA4 Transcription Factor, HEK293 Cells, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review