Cited by 247Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Distinct Mechanisms for Processing Spatial Sequences and Pitch Sequences in the Human Auditory Brain

Open access
Warren, J. D., Griffiths, T. D.·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Perception of the acoustic world requires the simultaneous processing of the acoustic patterns associated with sound objects and their location in space. In this functional magnetic resonance experiment, we investigated the human brain areas engaged in the analysis of pitch sequences and sequences of acoustic spatial locations in a paradigm in which both could be varied independently. Subjects were presented with sequences of sounds in which the individual sounds were regular interval noises with variable pitch. Positions of individual sounds were varied using a virtual acoustic space paradigm during scanning. Sound sequences with changing pitch specifically activated lateral Heschl's gyrus (HG), anterior planum temporale (PT), planum polare, and superior temporal gyrus anterior to HG. Sound sequences with changing spatial locations specifically activated posteromedial PT. These results demonstrate directly that distinct mechanisms for the analysis of pitch sequences and acoustic spatial sequences exist in the human brain. This functional differentiation is evident as early as PT: within PT, pitch pattern is processed anterolaterally and spatial location is processed posteromedially. These areas may represent human homologs of macaque lateral and medial belt, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-13-05799.2003

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower-level auditory regions such as the auditory belt regions in the planum temporale exhibit a preference for rising sounds, which correspond to sounds approaching the boundaries of PPS.

    “Notably, lower-level auditory regions such as the auditory belt regions located in the planum temporale (PT) exhibit a preference for rising sounds, which correspond to sounds approaching the boundaries of PPS (Warren et al. 2002; Seifritz et al. 2002; Warren and Griffiths 2003; Krumbholz et al. 2005).”

    From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Warren and Griffiths 2003

    The Discussion reports that spatial information is processed in the posteromedial planum temporale, and discusses auditory belt areas. But the paper does not report a preference for rising sounds or relate such sounds to approaching the boundaries of peripersonal space; its Methods describe changes in azimuthal position, not approaching sounds. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warren, J. D., & Griffiths, T. D.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-07-02
Volume
23
Issue
13
Pages
5799-5804
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2125229781
Cited by
247
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
auditory cortex, planum temporale, planum polare, superior temporal gyrus, virtual acoustic space, sound localization
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Pathways, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Noise, Pitch Perception, Reference Values, Sound Localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review