Cited by 94Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Novel scenes improve recollection and recall of words

Fenker, Daniela B., Frey, Julietta U., Schuetze, Hartmut, Heipertz, Dorothee, Heinze, Hans-Jochen, Duzel, Emrah·2008·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Exploring a novel environment can facilitate subsequent hippocampal long-term potentiation in animals. We report a related behavioral enhancement in humans. In two separate experiments, recollection and free recall, both measures of hippocampus-dependent memory formation, were enhanced for words studied after a 5-min exposure to unrelated novel as opposed to familiar images depicting indoor and outdoor scenes. With functional magnetic resonance imaging, the enhancement was predicted by specific activity patterns observed during novelty exposure in parahippocampal and dorsal prefrontal cortices, regions which are known to be linked to attentional orienting to novel stimuli and perceptual processing of scenes. Novelty was also associated with activation of the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area of the midbrain and the hippocampus, but these activations did not correlate with contextual memory enhancement. These findings indicate remarkable parallels between contextual memory enhancement in humans and existing evidence regarding contextually enhanced hippocampal plasticity in animals. They provide specific behavioral clues to enhancing hippocampus-dependent memory in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2008.20086

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenker, D. B., Frey, J. U., Schuetze, H., Heipertz, D., Heinze, H.-J., & Duzel, E.
Affiliations
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (DE)
  • 3University College London, UK
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
1250-1265
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W1988899743
Cited by
94
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
recollection, free recall, hippocampal-dependent memory, hippocampal long-term potentiation, novelty exposure, parahippocampal cortex, dorsal prefrontal cortex, substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area, attentional orienting, scene perception, word memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review