Cited by 190Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

Temporo-parietal junction activity in theory-of-mind tasks: falseness, beliefs, or attention

Aichhorn, Markus, Perner, Josef, Weiss, Benjamin, Kronbichler, Martin, Staffen, Wolfgang, Ladurner, Gunther·2009·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

By combining the false belief (FB) and photo (PH) vignettes to identify theory-of-mind areas with the false sign (FS) vignettes, we re-establish the functional asymmetry between the left and right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). The right TPJ (TPJ-R) is specially sensitive to processing belief information, whereas the left TPJ (TPJ-L) is equally responsible for FBs as well as FSs. Measuring BOLD at two time points in each vignette, at the time the FB-inducing information (or lack of information) is presented and at the time the test question is processed, made clear that the FB is processed spontaneously as soon as the relevant information is presented and not on demand for answering the question in contrast to extant behavioral data. Finally, a fourth, true belief vignette (TB) required teleological reasoning, that is, prediction of a rational action without any doubts being raised about the adequacy of the actor's information about reality. Activation by this vignette supported claims that the TPJ-R is activated by TBs as well as FBs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2009.21082

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Right TPJ has been proposed to play a role in managing divided attention and non-ToM-based perspective switching.

    “Along with ToM, right TPJ has been proposed to play a role in managing divided attention and non–ToM-based perspective switching (Mitchell, 2008; Aichhorn et al., 2009), although there is debate as to whether these functions are subserved by the same or separable components of the TPJ (Scholz et al., 2009).”

    From The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech (2016) · cites this paper as Aichhorn et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aichhorn, M., Perner, J., Weiss, B., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1179-1192
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2152388672
Cited by
190
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
theory of mind, temporoparietal junction, false belief, hemispheric lateralization, teleological reasoning, social cognition, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Carbamide Peroxide, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain Mapping, Culture, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Peroxides, Reality Testing, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors, Urea, Confidence Intervals, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review