Cited by 116Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Task-specific activity and connectivity within the mentalizing network during emotion and intention mentalizing

Atique, Bijoy, Erb, Michael, Gharabaghi, Alireza, Grodd, Wolfgang, Anders, Silke·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Mentalizing, i.e. the process of inferring another person's mental state, is thought to be primarily subserved by three brain regions, the VMPFC (ventromedial prefrontal cortex), precuneus and TPJ (temporo-parietal junction). However, it is still unclear what the exact roles of these regions in mentalizing are. Here, we compare activity within, and functional connectivity between, the VMPFC, precuneus and TPJ during two different mentalizing tasks. Specifically, we examine whether inferring another person's emotion ("emotion mentalizing") and inferring another person's intention ("intention mentalizing") activate similar or distinct subregions within the VMPFC, precuneus and TPJ, and whether these different kinds of mentalizing are associated with different patterns of functional connectivity between these regions. Our results indicate that emotion mentalizing and intention mentalizing activate partly distinct subregions of the right and left TPJ that can be spatially separated across participants. These subregions also showed different patterns of functional connectivity with the VMPFC: a more anterior region of the right and left TPJ, which was more strongly activated during emotion mentalizing, showed stronger functional connectivity with the VMPFC, particularly during emotion mentalizing, than a more posterior region that was more strongly activated during intention mentalizing. Critically, this double dissociation became evident only when the fine-scale distribution of activity within activated regions was analysed, and despite the fact that there was also a significant overlap of activity during the two tasks. Our findings provide first evidence that different neural modules might have evolved within the TPJ that show distinct patterns of functional connectivity and might subserve slightly different subfunctions of mentalizing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.036

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The right MTG and the two sections of the right precuneus that correlated with dialogic inner speech reports have previously been implicated in theory-of-mind.

    “For instance, the right MTG and the two sections of the right precuneus that correlated with dialogic inner speech reports have previously been implicated in theory-of-mind (Atique et al., 2011; Brüne et al., 2011).”

    From The brain's conversation with itself: neural substrates of dialogic inner speech (2016) · cites this paper as Atique et al., 2011

  • The middle occipital gyrus has been implicated in mentalizing or inferring the emotions of others.

    “For example, the middle occipital gyrus has been implicated in mentalizing or inferring the emotions of others (Atique et al., 2011; Schurz et al., 2014)”
  • rsFC changes in the middle occipital gyrus were similarly correlated with ERT-linked gains in attention, decentering, and reappraisal.

    “Finally, rsFC changes in the middle occipital gyrus, implicated with both attention (Benedek et al., 2016) and metacognition (Atique et al., 2011; Schurz et al., 2014) were similarly correlated with ERT-linked gains in attention, decentering, and reappraisal.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atique, B., Erb, M., Gharabaghi, A., Grodd, W., & Anders, S.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Anders, Silke
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1899-1911
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140619570
Cited by
116
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (AN 755/2-1)
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GW0752)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
mentalization, mental state inference, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, temporoparietal junction, functional connectivity, double dissociation, neural modules
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Task Performance and Analysis, Temporal Lobe, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review