Cited by 48Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

Impaired spontaneous belief inference following acquired damage to the left posterior temporoparietal junction

Open access
Biervoye, Aurélie, Dricot, Laurence, Ivanoiu, Adrian, Samson, Dana·2016·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Efficient social interactions require taking into account other people's mental states such as their beliefs, intentions or emotions. Recent studies have shown that in some social situations at least, we do spontaneously take into account others' mental states. The extent to which we have dedicated brain areas for such spontaneous perspective taking is however still unclear. Here, we report two brain-damaged patients whose common lesions were almost exclusively in the left posterior temporoparietal junction (TPJp) and who both showed the same striking and distinctive theory of mind (ToM) deficit. More specifically, they had an inability to take into account someone else's belief unless they were explicitly instructed to tell what that other person thinks or what that person will do. These patients offer a unique insight into the causal link between a specific subregion of the TPJ and a specific cognitive facet of ToM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsw076

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TPJ contributes to mentalizing and emotional state inference/attribution.

    “TPJ contributes to the mentalizing and emotional state inference/attribution”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Biervoye et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biervoye, A., Dricot, L., Ivanoiu, A., & Samson, D.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
Corresponding author
Samson, Dana
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2016-06-17
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
1513-1520
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2421648612
Cited by
48
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 17 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
theory of mind, belief inference, social cognition, acquired brain injury
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Thinking, Intention, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review