Cited by 92Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsAction Observation and Synchronization

Viewing one’s own face being touched modulates tactile perception: An fMRI study

Cardini, Flavia, Costantini, Marcello, Galati, Gaspare, Romani, Gian Luca, Làdavas, Elisabetta, Serino, Andrea·2011·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The perception of tactile stimuli on the face is modulated if subjects concurrently observe a face being touched; this effect, termed visual remapping of touch (VRT), is maximum for observing one's own face. In the present fMRI study, we investigated the neural basis of the VRT effect. Participants in the scanner received tactile stimuli, near the perceptual threshold, on their right, left, or both cheeks. Concurrently, they watched movies depicting their own face, another person's face, or a ball that could be touched or only approached by human fingers. Participants were requested to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral tactile stimulation. Behaviorally, perception of tactile stimuli was modulated by viewing a tactile stimulation, with a stronger effect when viewing one's own face being touched. In terms of brain activity, viewing touch was related with an enhanced activity in the ventral intraparietal area. The specific effect of viewing touch on oneself was instead related with a reduced activity in both the ventral premotor cortex and the somatosensory cortex. The present findings suggest that VRT is supported by a network of fronto-parietal areas. The ventral intraparietal area might remap visual information about touch onto tactile processing. Ventral premotor cortex might specifically modulate multisensory interaction when sensory information is related to one's own body. Then this activity might back project to the somatosensory cortices, thus affecting tactile perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2010.21484

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vPMc was activated more when the seen face belonged to another person, rather than to themselves.

    “In addition, the vPMc was activated more when the seen face belonged to another person, rather than to themselves (see also Serino, Pizzoferrato, & Ladavas, 2008).”

    From Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness (2013) · cites this paper as Cardini et al., 2011

  • The vPMc is active when subjects received tactile stimulation on their own face and viewed another face being touched.

    “Cardini et al. (2011) have recently shown that the vPMc is active when subjects received tactile stimulation on their own face and viewed another face being touched.”

    From Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness (2013) · cites this paper as Cardini et al., 2011

  • Looking at one's own face whilst experiencing touch reduces activity in the somatosensory cortex and the multisensory Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG), as compared to looking at another's face and experiencing touch.

    “Similarly it has been shown that looking at one’s own face whilst experiencing touch reduces activity in the (unimodal) somtosensory cortex and the multisensory Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG), as compared to the activity evoked by looking at another’s face and experiencing touch (Cardini et al., 2011).”

    From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Cardini et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardini, F., Costantini, M., Galati, G., Romani, G. L., Làdavas, E., & Serino, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
503-513
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2028778072
Cited by
92
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
tactile perception, self-face perception, multisensory integration, ventral intraparietal area, ventral premotor cortex, somatosensory cortex, frontoparietal network, body ownership
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Face, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Visual Perception, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review