Cited by 614Action Observation and SynchronizationTactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integration

Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision–touch synaesthesia

Open access
Blakemore, S.-J., Bristow, D., Bird, G., Frith, C., Ward, J.·2005·Brain

Abstract

In this study, we describe a new form of synaesthesia in which visual perception of touch elicits conscious tactile experiences in the perceiver. We describe a female subject (C) for whom the observation of another person being touched is experienced as tactile stimulation on the equivalent part of C's own body. Apart from this clearly abnormal synesthetic experience, C is healthy and normal in every other way. In this study, we investigate whether C's 'mirrored touch' synesthetic experience is caused by overactivity in the neural system that responds to the observation of touch. A functional MRI experiment was designed to investigate the neural system involved in the perception of touch in a group of 12 non-synesthetic control subjects and in C. We investigated neural activity to the observation of touch to a human face or neck compared with the observation of touch to equivalent regions on an object. Furthermore, to investigate the somatosensory topography of the activations during observation of touch, we compared activations when observing a human face or neck being touched with activations when the subjects themselves were touched on their own face or neck. The results demonstrated that the somatosensory cortex was activated in the non-synesthetic subjects by the mere observation of touch and that this activation was somatotopically organized such that observation of touch to the face activated the head area of primary somatosensory cortex, whereas observation of touch to the neck did not. Moreover, in non-synesthetic subjects, the brain's mirror system-comprising premotor cortex, superior temporal sulcus and parietal cortex-was activated by the observation of touch to another human more than to an object. C's activation patterns differed in three ways from those of the non-synesthetic controls. First, activations in the somatosensory cortex were significantly higher in C when she observed touch. Secondly, an area in left premotor cortex was activated in C to a greater extent than in the non-synesthetic group. Thirdly, the anterior insula cortex bilaterally was activated in C, but there was no evidence of such activation in the non-synesthetic group. The results suggest that, in C, the mirror system for touch is overactive, above the threshold for conscious tactile perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awh500

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blakemore, S.-J., Bristow, D., Bird, G., Frith, C., & Ward, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Blakemore, S.-J.
Venue
Brain
Published
2005-04-07
Volume
128
Issue
7
Pages
1571-1583
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2112728582
Cited by
614
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
FWCI
37.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
somatosensory cortex, somatotopic organization, mirror system, premotor cortex, superior temporal sulcus, anterior insula, tactile perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Perceptual Disorders, Psychophysics, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Video Recording, Visual Perception, Case-Control Studies, Somatosensory Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review