Cited by 108High Altitude and HypoxiaNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Reliability of noninvasive oximetry in black subjects during exercise and hypoxia

Zeballos, R. Jorge, Weisman, Idelle M.·1991·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Abstract The effect of skin pigmentation on the reliability of noninvasive oximetry, especially during exercise and hypoxia, has not been thoroughly investigated. This is the first study, to our knowledge, that specifically addresses this question. Thirty-three young black men performed multistage, steady-state cycle ergometry, breathing gas mixtures simulating different altitudes: 33 breathed gas simulating sea level (Pi O2 = 146 mm Hg), 11 breathed gas simulating 2,300 m (Pi O2 = 110 mm Hg), and 22 breathed gas simulating 4,000 m (Pi O2 = 85 mm Hg). Co-oximeter SaO2 determinations were performed in arterial blood samples obtained concurrently with ear oximetry that was measured using Hewlett-Packard 47201A (HP) and Biox IIA oximeters. The mean error or bias for the [HP - SaO2] and for [Biox IIA - SaO2] ± 95% CI were: at simulated sea level (SaO2 > 96%): −0.4 ± 0.3% and 2.1 ± 0.3%; at simulated 2,300 m (range of SaO2 means, 89 to 94%): −0.8 ± 0.5% and 3.5 ± 0.9%; for simulated 4,000 m (range of SaO2 means, 75 to 84%): −4.8 ± 1.6% and 9.8 ± 1.8%, respectively. A better coefficient correlation was observed for all the pairs between SaO2 versus HP (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, n = 279) than for the SaO2 versus Biox IIA (r = 0.80, p < 0.001, n = 242). In conclusion, the HP oximeter appears to estimate SaO2 more accurately than the Biox IIA oximeter. The previously described overestimation for the Biox IIA ear oximeter and the underestimation for the HP ear oximeter at low SaO2 values in whites is exaggerated in blacks. Although noninvasive oximetry may be used to follow desaturation trends in blacks, it would be unreliable to estimate absolute SaO2. The clinical utility of noninvasive oximetry in blacks is unacceptable at values of SaO2 < 85% for the HP and < 90% for the Biox IIA oximeters. The effect of skin pigmentation on the reliability of the many newer pulse oximeters requires further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/144.6.1240

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeballos, R. J., & Weisman, I. M.
Affiliations
William Beaumont Army Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1991-12-01
Volume
144
Issue
6
Pages
1240-1244
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010341130
Cited by
108
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Review of Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
ear oximetry, skin pigmentation, Black subject, oxygen saturation, hypoxia, physical activity, simulated altitude, co-oximetry, arterial blood gases, measurement bias, correlation coefficient, young men
MeSH terms
Adult, Hypoxia, Ear, External, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Oximetry, Skin Pigmentation, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review