Cited by 102Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Effect of skin pigmentation on pulse oximetry accuracy in the emergency department

Open access
Adler, Jonathan N., Hughes, Lori A., Vtvilecchia, Robert, Jr., Carlos A. Camargo·1998·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pulse oximeter (PO) accuracy and signal quality are affected by level of skin pigmentation. METHODS: Observational study in a community hospital ED. Consecutive adult patients undergoing arterial blood gas determination were enrolled into the study. Skin pigmentation was determined by comparison with standardized color swatches under controlled lighting; assigned values were used to stratify patients into 3 groups (light, intermediate, and dark) using predetermined criteria. Simultaneous with arterial blood sampling, staff recorded PO reading of O2 saturation using the Nellcor D-25 oximeter. PO values were compared with criterion standard values measured using a 4-wavelength spectrophotometer or co-oximeter. PO signal quality also was recorded. Bias (the mean difference between PO and co-oximeter-measured values of hemoglobin saturation) and precision (the standard deviation of the bias) were calculated. Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA, Bartlett's test for variances, and chi2 test. RESULTS: O2 saturation data were obtained for 284 patients. Bias values did not differ between the 3 skin pigment groups (p = 0.79). Precision was of borderline significance (p = 0.05), but there was no dose-response relation between skin pigmentation and precision. Study personnel reported suboptimal PO function most often among patients in the dark group (p = 0.003), but this finding was of no clinical significance. PO signal failure was rare (<1% of all patients). CONCLUSIONS: Although several prior studies suggest the contrary, this study found that skin pigmentation does not affect the bias or precision of pulse oximetry. Furthermore, skin pigmentation has no clinically significant effect on PO signal quality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02772.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hess D, Kacmarek RM. Techniques and devices for moni- toring oxygenation. Respir Care. 1993; 38:646-71.
  2. Barker SJ, Tremper KK, Hyatt JH. Effect of methemoglo- binemia on pulse oximetry and mixed venous oximetry. Anes- thesiology. 1989; 70:112-7.
  3. New W. Pulse oximetry. J Clin Monit. 1985; 1:126-31.
  4. Young K. A study of the accuracy of pulse oximetry among varying skin pigmentation populations [abstract]. Am J Crit Care. 1995; 4: 256.
  5. Saunders NA, Powles ACP, Rebuck AS. E a r oximetry: ac- curacy and practicability in the assessment of arterial oxygen- ation. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976; 113:745-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adler, J. N., Hughes, L. A., Vtvilecchia, R., & Jr., C. A. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Lowell General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Adler, Jonathan N.
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-10
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
965-970
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2053872280
Cited by
102
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k14hl003533-04)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL03533)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
pulse oximetry, skin pigmentation, oxygen saturation, measurement accuracy, signal quality, arterial blood gases, emergency department, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, measurement bias, measurement precision
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Skin Pigmentation, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review