Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inflammatory Response in Dry Eye

Open access
Yamaguchi, Takefumi·2018·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

Purpose: Dry eye is a major ocular pathology worldwide. Although dry eye is a multifactorial disease, recent studies have shown that chronic immunologic processes have a pivotal role in its pathogenesis, characterized by the infiltration of immune cells in the lacrimal glands, elevated levels of tear inflammatory cytokines, and increased density of immune cells in the cornea and conjunctiva. This review describes the recent advances in understanding the relationship between dry eye and inflammation. Methods: This narrative review is based on searches of recent international literature using terms related to the immune response in dry eye, and includes clinical trials, animal experiments, and expert reviews. Results: Although dry eye presents clinically as tear film instability associated with corneal/conjunctival epithelial disorders, Meibomian gland dysfunction, and decreased visual function, recent laboratory and clinical studies have indicated inflammation in the lacrimal glands, Meibomian glands, conjunctiva, cornea, and aqueous tears. Furthermore, inflammation at these locations leads to conjunctival goblet cell apoptosis, corneal epithelial barrier disruption, and corneal nerve damage. These inflammatory outcomes can be exacerbated by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as aging, sex steroid hormone, autoimmune diseases, contact lens use, visual display terminals, and dry environment. Conclusions: Recent advances in dry eye research have revealed the inflammatory process and its pathogenesis, which has been proposed as an "inflammatory vicious cycle" of dry eye. Comprehensive assessment of dry eye based on inflammation will improve the selection of treatments and help break the inflammatory cycle in clinical settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.17-23651

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Yamaguchi, T.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2018-11-27
Volume
59
Issue
14
Pages
DES192
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2902643770
Cited by
264
References
70
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.