Cited by 233Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Loving‐Kindness Meditation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Pilot Study

Kearney, David J., Malte, Carol A., McManus, Carolyn, Martinez, Michelle E., Felleman, Ben, Simpson, Tracy L.·2013·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Loving‐kindness meditation is a practice designed to enhance feelings of kindness and compassion for self and others. Loving‐kindness meditation involves repetition of phrases of positive intention for self and others. We undertook an open pilot trial of loving‐kindness meditation for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Measures of PTSD, depression, self‐compassion, and mindfulness were obtained at baseline, after a 12‐week loving‐kindness meditation course, and 3 months later. Effect sizes were calculated from baseline to each follow‐up point, and self‐compassion was assessed as a mediator. Attendance was high; 74% attended 9–12 classes. Self‐compassion increased with large effect sizes and mindfulness increased with medium to large effect sizes. A large effect size was found for PTSD symptoms at 3‐month follow‐up (d = −0.89), and a medium effect size was found for depression at 3‐month follow‐up (d = −0.49). There was evidence of mediation of reductions in PTSD symptoms and depression by enhanced self‐compassion. Overall, loving‐kindness meditation appeared safe and acceptable and was associated with reduced symptoms of PTSD and depression. Additional study of loving‐kindness meditation for PTSD is warranted to determine whether the changes seen are due to the loving‐kindness meditation intervention versus other influences, including concurrent receipt of other treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.21832

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearney, D. J., Malte, C. A., McManus, C., Martinez, M. E., Felleman, B., & Simpson, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • Swedish Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kearney, David J.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-25
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
426-434
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W2148230172
Cited by
233
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
loving-kindness meditation, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, self-compassion, depression, mindfulness, meditation intervention, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Empathy, Female, Humans, Love, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Meditation, Intention, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review