The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Corporate Social Action: Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data
Abstract
The contribution of this work is a classification of corporate social action underlying the Social Ratings Data compiled by Kinder Lydenburg Domini Analytics, Inc. We compare extant typologies of corporate social action to the results of our exploratory factor analysis. Our findings indicate four distinct latent constructs that bear resemblance to concepts discussed in prior literature. Akey finding of our research is that positive and negative social action are both empirically and conceptually distinct constructs and should not be combined in future research. Additionally, we recommend that some prior research results be reconsidered to determine whether these newly derived measures might clarify some previous findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences
Stebbins, R. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781412984249 · Cited by 1,840
Cited by
Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51383 · Cited by 1,959
Environmental risk management and the cost of capital
Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.678 · Cited by 1,530
Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030 · Cited by 1,134
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2268 · Cited by 1,124
Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance
Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.759 · Cited by 791
How firms respond to being rated
Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.840 · Cited by 547
Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry
Melo, T., & Garrido‐Morgado, A. (2012) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.260 · Cited by 476
Doing good deeds in times of need: a strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations
Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.917 · Cited by 385
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7 · Cited by 381
Corporate Environmental Policy and Shareholder Value: Following the Smart Money
Fernando, C. S., Sharfman, M. P., & Uysal, V. B. (2017) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109017000680 · Cited by 241
Crifo, P., Forget, V. D., & Teyssier, S. (2015) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.006 · Cited by 218
Shareholder Activism on Sustainability Issues
Grewal, J., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2805512 · Cited by 136
CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective
Opoku‐Dakwa, A., Chen, C. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2281 · Cited by 111
The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
(2012) · Cited by 39
Sustainable human resource management and employee engagement: A holistic assessment instrument
Diaz‐Carrion, R., López‐Fernández, M., & Romero‐Fernandez, P. M. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1921 · Cited by 38
Lin, W. L., Lee, C., & Law, S. H. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2662 · Cited by 30
Silveira, A. D. M. D., & Donaggio, A. R. F. (2020) · DESC - Direito, Economia e Sociedade Contemporânea · doi:10.33389/desc.v2n2.2019.p11-42 · Cited by 8
An Investor Perspective on the Black Box of Corporate Social Responsibility
Fernando, C. S., Uysal, V. B., & Abeysekera, A. P. (2019) · Journal of Applied Corporate Finance · doi:10.1111/jacf.12351 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L.
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-46
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W2092895486
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
