Cited by 591AI and HR TechnologiesCorporate Management and LeadershipImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

The Feeling Economy: Managing in the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Huang, Ming-Hui, Rust, Roland, Maksimovic, Vojislav·2019·California Management Review

Abstract

The capability of AI is currently expanding beyond mechanical and repetitive to analytical and thinking. A “Feeling Economy” is emerging, in which AI performs many of the analytical and thinking tasks, and human workers gravitate more toward interpersonal and empathetic tasks. Although these people-focused tasks have always been important to jobs, they are now becoming more important to an unprecedented degree. To manage more effectively in the Feeling Economy, managers must adapt the nature of jobs to compensate for the fact that many of the analytical and thinking tasks are increasingly being performed by AI, and, thus, human workers must place increased emphasis on the empathetic and emotional dimensions of their work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0008125619863436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ordered by the difficulty with which AI can address them, there are mechanical, thinking, and feeling AI intelligences.

    “Ordered by the difficulty with which AI can address them, there are mechanical, thinking, and feeling AI intelligences (Huang and Rust 2018; Huang et al. 2019).”

    From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Huang et al. 2019

  • Managers and management education are underpreparing the next generation for feeling and emotional intelligence.

    “managers and management education underpreparing the next generation for feeling and emotional intelligence (Huang and Rust 2018; Huang et al. 2019)”

    From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Huang et al. 2019

  • A consistent finding across domains is the necessity of a central entity to ensure transparency and alignment throughout the lifecycle of AI implementation.

    “A consistent finding across domains was the necessity of a central entity to ensure transparency and alignment throughout the lifecycle of AI implementation39–41.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, M.-H., Rust, R., & Maksimovic, V.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
California Management Review
Published
2019-07-21
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
43-65
ISSN
  • 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-8564
OpenAlex
W2964167195
Cited by
591
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 4
FWCI
58.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
California Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence, human-AI collaboration, job design, emotional labor, empathy, interpersonal work, future of work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review