The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Field Investigation of Causal Relations among Cognitions, Affect, Intentions, and Behavior
Abstract
A new method for representing attitudinal reactions is developed and related to current information integration approaches. Hypotheses are tested about the effects of expectancy-value measures and affect toward the act on intentions and subsequent behavior. The findings lead to a modification and extension of current attitudinal models and their relation to intentions and behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.
Anderson, N. H. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0029064 · Cited by 576
Cited by
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Self-citationUser Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Self-citationUnderstanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800109 · Cited by 3,322
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Self-citationExtending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00101-3 · Cited by 1,772
Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use
Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 · Cited by 1,540
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011 · Cited by 1,218
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624
An investigation into the role of intentions as mediators of the attitude-behavior relationship
Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, J., & Yi, Y. (1989) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/0167-4870(89)90056-1 · Cited by 418
Self-citationA feedback model to understand information system usage
Bajaj, A., & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00026-3 · Cited by 266
Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 2
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834462 · Cited by 257
Post-adoption behaviors of e-service customers: The interplay of cognition and emotion
Chea, S., & Luo, M. M. (2008) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415120303 · Cited by 188
van Harreveld, F., Nohlen, H. U., & Schneider, I. K. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002 · Cited by 183
Financial inclusion and fintech: a state-of-the-art systematic literature review
Ha, D., Le, P., & Nguyen, D. K. (2025) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-024-00741-0 · Cited by 110
“The theory of reasoned action (Fishbein et al. 1980; Bagozzi 1982) suggests that end users rationally evaluate potential consequences before engaging with a new technology.”
Recall, Recognition, and the Measurement of Memory for Print Advertisements
Bagozzi, R. P., & Silk, A. J. (1983) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2.2.95 · Cited by 110
Self-citationDeveloping the Commitment to Virtual Community: The Balanced Effects of Cognition and Affect
Gupta, S., & Kim, H.-W. (2007) · Information Resources Management Journal · doi:10.4018/irmj.2007010103 · Cited by 99
R. Vijayasarathy, J. M. J. (2000) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1080/10196780050033953 · Cited by 87
Yi, Y. J., You, S., & Bae, B. J. (2016) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-04-2016-0038 · Cited by 50
The impact of response format on relations among intentions, attitudes and social norms
Ellen, P. S., & Madden, T. J. (1990) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00435299 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagozzi, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-584
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2334062494
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
