Cited by 337Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Emotion Regulation in Current and Remitted Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Visted, Endre, Vøllestad, Jon, Nielsen, Morten Birkeland, Schanche, Elisabeth·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent, recurrent and potentially chronic disorder. Identifying risk factors and underlying mechanisms to inform preventive and therapeutic interventions is therefore imperative. Emotion regulation is a proposed factor in the development and maintenance of MDD. The aim of the present review was to summarize and synthesize research on self-reported emotion regulation strategy use and emotion regulation abilities in adults diagnosed with current and remitted MDD. Methods Seventy-two eligible studies were retrieved from databases through a systematic literature search. Group differences between individuals with current MDD, remitted MDD and healthy controls were calculated using meta-analytic procedures. Meta-regression analyses investigated potential moderator effects on emotion regulation difficulties. Results Results indicated that individuals with current MDD report higher maladaptive emotion regulation strategy use for avoidance (Hedges’ g = 1.3), rumination (g = 2.1) and suppression (g = 1.1) compared to healthy controls. Also, they reported lower adaptive emotion regulation strategy use for acceptance (g =-1.0), problem solving (g = -1.0) and reappraisal (g = -0.7). Individuals with current MDD reported limited general emotion regulation abilities, indicated by higher alexithymia (g =1.45), lower emotional awareness (g =-0.95), emotional clarity (g = -1.50) and emotional tolerance (g =-1.89). Similar results were found in individuals with remitted MDD for avoidance (g = 1.0), rumination (g = 1.1), suppression (g = 0.6) and general emotion regulation abilities. However, no difference was found between individuals with remitted MDD and healthy controls for adaptive emotion regulation strategies. Meta-regression analyses suggest that age of illness onset, comorbid anxiety and duration of remission influence emotion regulation. Conclusion The present review and meta-analysis indicates that individuals with current and remitted MDD have difficulties with emotion regulation compared to individuals who have never been depressed. Although depressive symptoms improve, emotion regulation difficulties may continue, and could be a contributing factor to relapse. Our findings inform future research on emotion regulation and psychotherapeutic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00756

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Difficulties in emotion regulation strategy use play a central role in the development, maintenance, and treatment of depression and anxiety disorders.

    “Difficulties in emotion regulation strategy use play a central role in the development, maintenance, and treatment of depression and anxiety disorders [27–29].”

    From Emotion Regulation as a Mechanism of Mindfulness in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction describes emotion-regulation difficulties as a potential mechanism in the development and maintenance of depression. The Discussion > Implications identifies maladaptive strategies as a psychotherapy target in depression and mentions emotion-regulation interventions for anxiety disorders. The paper does not establish that difficulties in strategy use play a central role in the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders; its findings concern current and remitted depression, including comorbid anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rumination, avoidance, and suppression maintain and exacerbate internalizing psychopathology.

    “The first pathway to mitigating anxiety and depression symptoms involves reducing perseverative and avoidant emotion regulation strategies, such as rumination, avoidance, and suppression, which are known to maintain and exacerbate internalizing psychopathology [29, 58–62].”

    From Emotion Regulation as a Mechanism of Mindfulness in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction (Emotion regulation and major depressive disorder; page not provided) says rumination increases the duration of depressed mood and vulnerability to depressive episodes, while suppression may intensify emotional responses. The Discussion (Key findings in trials with current and remitted MDD; page not provided) links all three strategies to depression and suggests they may contribute to relapse. The paper does not establish that all three maintain and exacerbate internalizing psychopathology broadly, including anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reducing perseverative and avoidant emotion regulation strategies is a pathway to mitigating anxiety and depression symptoms.

    “The first pathway to mitigating anxiety and depression symptoms involves reducing perseverative and avoidant emotion regulation strategies, such as rumination, avoidance, and suppression, which are known to maintain and exacerbate internalizing psychopathology [29, 58–62].”

    From Emotion Regulation as a Mechanism of Mindfulness in Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction classifies rumination, avoidance, and suppression as potentially maladaptive, and the Discussion > Implications identifies maladaptive emotion regulation as a psychotherapy target in depression. The Discussion also associates these strategies with comorbid anxiety, but the paper does not establish that reducing them mitigates both anxiety and depression symptoms; it calls for further studies of treatment effects. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Farb N. A. S. Anderson A. K. Irving J. A. Segal Z. V. (2014). Mindfulness interventions and emotion regulation, in Handbook of Emotion Regulation, 2nd Edn., ed Gross J. J. (New York, NY: The Guilford Press), 548– 567.
  2. First M. B. Spitzer R. L. Gibbon M. Williams J. B. W. (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition. (SCID-I/P). New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  3. Margraf J. Schneider S. (2006). Diagnostisches Interview Bei Psychischen Störungen [Diagnostic Interview for Mental Disorders]. Heidelberg: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visted, E., Vøllestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., & Schanche, E.
Affiliations
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • National Institute of Occupational Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Visted, Endre
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-05-18
Volume
9
Pages
756-756
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800418807
Cited by
337
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • L. Meltzers Høyskolefond (7183, 16545)
  • Universitetet i Bergen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotion regulation, major depressive disorder, remitted depression, maladaptive emotion regulation, rumination, avoidance, emotional suppression, cognitive reappraisal, acceptance, alexithymia, emotional awareness, emotional clarity, emotional tolerance, relapse risk, anxiety comorbidity, remission duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review