Cited by 120Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Using Brief Cognitive Restructuring and Cognitive Defusion Techniques to Cope With Negative Thoughts

Open access
Larsson, Andreas, Hooper, Nic, Osborne, Lisa A., Bennett, Paul, McHugh, Louise·2016·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Negative thoughts, experienced by 80% to 99% of the non-clinical population, have been linked to the development of psychopathology. The current study aimed to compare a cognitive restructuring and cognitive defusion technique for coping with a personally relevant negative thought. Over a 5-day period, participants used either a restructuring, defusion, or control strategy to manage a negative thought. Pre- and post-intervention participants reported (a) believability of the thought, (b) discomfort associated with the thought, (c) negativity associated with the thought, and (d) willingness to experience the thought. Daily online questionnaires assessing the total frequency of negative thought intrusions and their level of willingness to experience the negative thought were also used. Also, 10 positive and negative self-statements were rated on the same scales, and self-report measures of mood and psychological flexibility were completed. Findings indicated that defusion lowered believability, increased comfort and willingness to have the target thought, and increased positive affect significantly more than the control and cognitive restructuring. Within groups, cognitive restructuring also made significant gains in target thought discomfort, negativity, and “willingness to have” in the same direction as defusion but the no-instruction control did not. Negative thought frequency was reduced in the defusion group, maintained in the restructuring group, and increased in the no-instruction control group. Similar trends emerged from the secondary outcome measures, that is, the effects of the strategies on the positive and negative self-statements. The current findings support the efficacy of using defusion as a strategy for managing negative thoughts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445515621488

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsson, A., Hooper, N., Osborne, L. A., Bennett, P., & McHugh, L.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, UK
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Larsson, Andreas
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2015-12-18
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
452-482
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2240594527
Cited by
120
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health and Care Research Wales (SCS/09/08)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive restructuring, cognitive defusion, negative thinking, coping strategies, psychological flexibility, self-statements, positive affect, acceptance and commitment therapy
MeSH terms
Pessimism, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review