Cited by 37Cancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Coping Skills Training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Symptom Management: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Brief Telephone-Delivered Protocol for Patients With Advanced Cancer

Open access
Plumb Vilardaga, Jennifer C., Winger, Joseph G., Teo, Irene, Owen, Lynda, Sutton, Linda M., Keefe, Francis J., Somers, Tamara J.·2020·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Patients with advanced cancer face a life-limiting condition that brings a high symptom burden that often includes pain, fatigue, and psychological distress. Psychosocial interventions have promise for managing symptoms but need additional tailoring for these patients' specific needs. Patients with advanced cancer in the community also face persistent barriers-availability of interventions in community clinics as well as financial and illness-related factors-to accessing psychosocial interventions.Objectives The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of telephone implementation of Engage, a novel brief combined Coping Skills Training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy protocol, for reducing symptoms and increasing quality of life in community patients with advanced cancer.Methods Adult patients with advanced cancer receiving care in the community received Engage, four 60-minute manualized telephone sessions delivered by a trained psychotherapist and completed pretreatment and post-treatment assessments.Results Engage was feasible, achieving 100% accrual (N = 24) of a heterogeneous sample of patients with advanced cancer, with good retention (88% completed). Acceptability was demonstrated via satisfaction (mean 29 of 32; SD 2), engagement (95% attendance), and use of skills. Secondary analyses pointed to reductions in pain interference, fatigue, psychological distress, and improvements in psychological acceptance and engagement in value-guided activity after treatment.Conclusion Engage, our brief novel combined Coping Skills and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention, demonstrated initial feasibility and acceptability when delivered over the telephone and increased access for community clinic patients with advanced cancer. Future research will assess the comparative efficacy of Engage in larger randomized trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.005

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only two of five studies examining pain interference showed improvements (40%), one pre/post study and one RCT, both not statistically significant.

    “Only two of five of the studies examining pain interference showed improvements (40%), one pre/post study 52 and one RCT 16 showed improvements that were not significant.”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for people with advanced progressive illness, their caregivers and staff involved in their care: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Methods and Results (Secondary Outcomes; page unavailable) identify this as a pre/post, single-arm feasibility study and report a small improvement in pain-related interference. The available passages do not establish that the change was statistically nonsignificant. Nor does this paper establish the citing document’s count of two improvements among five studies; the separate RCT is attributed to citation 16. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Six studies showed improvements in valued living post intervention, although only one RCT showed statistically significant improvements.

    “Six studies showed improvements in valued living post intervention,46,52,60,63,66 although only one RCT showed statistically significant improvements. 66”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for people with advanced progressive illness, their caregivers and staff involved in their care: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results (Secondary Outcomes; page unavailable) report small post-intervention improvements in values-based action, supporting this paper’s inclusion among studies showing improvement. But the same passage calls it a small, single-arm feasibility trial, not an RCT; it does not support the statistically significant RCT finding attributed to citation 66 or establish the count of six studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Following ACT, participants in most studies reported improvements in psychological flexibility, anxiety, and depression.

    “Following Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, participants in most studies reported improvements in psychological flexibility,46,52,53,55,57,61–63,66,68 anxiety,16,52–54,63,66 and depression.16,52–54,63,66”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for people with advanced progressive illness, their caregivers and staff involved in their care: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results (Secondary Outcomes; page unavailable) report small, exploratory improvements in psychological distress, acceptance, and values-based action. The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) show that distress was assessed with anxiety and depression questions, but the reported results do not establish separate improvements in each. This was also a single-arm trial combining ACT with coping skills training, so it cannot isolate the effects of ACT. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our results in combination with prior research provide a strong rationale for large-scale trials of ACT to reduce symptom interference in advanced cancer and promote feasible engagement in activities that enrich quality of life.

    “Our results in combination with prior research10–13 provide a strong rationale for large-scale trials of ACT to reduce symptom interference in advanced cancer and promote feasible engagement in activities that enrich quality of life.”

    From Symptom experiences in advanced cancer: Relationships to acceptance and commitment therapy constructs (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction describes ACT as an approach to reducing symptom interference and supporting engagement in valued activities. The Discussion calls for larger randomized trials, but the intervention this paper tested combined ACT with coping skills training; its results do not establish the effects of ACT alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Twelve studies (80%) reported patient satisfaction rates with their interventions.

    “Twelve studies (80%) reported patient satisfaction rates with their interventions16,49,52–54,57,60 –63,66,68”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plumb Vilardaga, J. C., Winger, J. G., Teo, I., Owen, L., Sutton, L. M., Keefe, F. J., & Somers, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
270-278
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974376060
Cited by
36
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (U24NR014637)
  • American Cancer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
advanced cancer, symptom management, coping skills training, acceptance and commitment therapy, telephone-delivered intervention, feasibility, acceptability, pain interference, fatigue, psychological distress, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Telephone, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review