Cited by 180Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The Role of Empathic Accuracy in Adolescents' Peer Relations and Adjustment

Gleason, Katie A., Jensen-Campbell, Lauri A., Ickes, William·2009·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

This study investigated whether children's empathic accuracy is associated with their peer relationships and adjustment. It also examined whether, and how, empathic accuracy moderated the known influence of peer relations on adjustment. Participants were 116 (58 boys) fifth-through eighth-graders. At school, child participants completed measures assessing their peer relationships. In the lab, child participants completed a performance-based measure of empathic accuracy and measures of adjustment. Teachers and parents also provided assessments. Results revealed that children who were less adept at inferring other people's thoughts and feelings were more likely to experience adjustment problems. Empathic accuracy acted as a buffer against adjustment problems when peer relationships were poor: Previously found links between poor peer relationships and poor adjustment were found for adolescents with low empathic accuracy but not for those with high empathic accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167209336605

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consensus measures of EA like the one used here can predict social functioning in typically developing individuals.

    “In behavioral research, consensus measures of EA like the one used here already have proven to be powerful measures of social function: they can predict social functioning in typically developing individuals (44) and distinguish them from perceivers with psychological disorders characterized by social impairments, such as ASD (41).”

    From The neural bases of empathic accuracy (2009) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gleason, K. A., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Ickes, W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • University of Texas at Arlington
Corresponding author
Gleason, Katie A.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2009-06-04
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
997-1011
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2092853975
Cited by
180
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
empathic accuracy, peer relationships, adolescent adjustment, social adjustment problems, theory of mind, mentalization, moderation, junior high school students, peer rejection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Child, Empathy, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Personality Assessment, Psychological Theory, Social Adjustment, Sociometric Techniques, Personal Construct Theory, Crime Victims, Self Efficacy, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review