Cited by 9Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringPersonality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Narcissism and self-versus recipient-oriented imagery in charitable giving.

Kang, Esther, Lakshmanan, Arun·2018·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Prior research documents extensively that high-narcissism individuals largely tend to be self-centered and often lack empathy. This research outlines the charitable appeal types that can activate empathic responses and other-centered behaviors from high-narcissism individuals. Across four studies, we show that donors who are higher in narcissism exhibit greater charitable intentions when appealed to via imagine-self charitable appeals (as opposed to imagine-recipient types of appeals). Imagine-self appeals enable high-narcissism donors to project themselves into the recipient's situation and, in doing so, elicit greater empathy and, consequently, greater charity. This effect dissipates when projecting oneself is very difficult or impossible-such as with animal recipients or the other gender suffering a gender-specific ailment. We also explicate the underlying process role of self-focused imagination and empathy in heightening charitable outcomes from high-narcissism individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167218764658

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although lack of empathy gives a narcissist the green light to commit a criminal act, the initial feeling of deserving the best may also be crucial for narcissistic crimes.

    “Although lack of empathy gives a narcissist the “green light” to commit a criminal act, the initial feeling of deserving the best may also be crucial for narcissistic crimes (57).”
  • Addressing empathy in education, training, or public campaigns might be an efficient way to get to the heart of narcissists' inadequacy.

    “Consequently, addressing empathy in education, training, or public campaigns might be an efficient way to get to the heart of narcissists’ inadequacy (57).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, E., & Lakshmanan, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Kang, Esther
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2018-04-09
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
1214-1227
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2797302871
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität zu Köln
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
narcissism, charitable giving, fundraising appeal, empathy, self-centeredness, donor behavior, gender differences in giving
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Empathy, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Narcissism, Self Concept, Gift Giving, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review