Cited by 152Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Moving Narcissus: Can Narcissists Be Empathic?

Hepper, Erica G., Hart, Claire M., Sedikides, Constantine·2014·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Empathy plays a critical role in fostering and maintaining social relations. Narcissists lack empathy, and this may account for their interpersonal failures. But why do narcissists lack empathy? Are they incapable, or is change possible? Three studies addressed this question. Study 1 showed that the link between narcissism and low empathy generalizes to a specific target person presented in a vignette. The effect was driven by maladaptive narcissistic components (i.e., entitlement, exploitativeness, exhibitionism). Study 2 examined the effect of perspective-taking (vs. control) instructions on self-reported responses to a video. Study 3 examined the effect of the same manipulation on autonomic arousal (heart rate [HR]) during an audio-recording. Perspective-taking ameliorated negative links between maladaptive narcissism and both self-reported empathy and HR. That is, narcissists can be moved by another's suffering, if they take that person's perspective. The findings demonstrate that narcissists' low empathy does not reflect inability, implying potential for intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167214535812

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in empathy processing were considered a hallmark of pathological narcissism.

    “An interplay between narcissism and empathy was investigated from the clinical conceptualization of NPD to its launch in the DSM–III (22), deficits in empathy processing was considered a hallmark of pathological narcissism (23–26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hepper, E. G., Hart, C. M., & Sedikides, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2014-05-30
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
1079-1091
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2096836634
Cited by
152
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Southampton Solent University
  • University of Southampton
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
narcissism, empathy, maladaptive narcissism, perspective taking, entitlement, exploitativeness, exhibitionism, autonomic arousal, heart rate, interpersonal relationships, empathy interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review