Cited by 278Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Narcissistic personality disorder: relations with distress and functional impairment

Open access
Miller, Joshua D., Campbell, W. Keith, Pilkonis, Paul A.·2007·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

This study examined the construct validity of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) by examining the relations between NPD and measures of psychologic distress and functional impairment both concurrently and prospectively across 2 samples. In particular, the goal was to address whether NPD typically "meets" criterion C of the DSM-IV definition of Personality Disorder, which requires that the symptoms lead to clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning. Sample 1 (n = 152) was composed of individuals receiving psychiatric treatment, whereas sample 2 (n = 151) was composed of both psychiatric patients (46%) and individuals from the community. Narcissistic personality disorder was linked to ratings of depression, anxiety, and several measures of impairment both concurrently and at 6-month follow-up. However, the relations between NPD and psychologic distress were (a) small, especially in concurrent measurements, and (b) largely mediated by impaired functioning. Narcissistic personality disorder was most strongly related to causing pain and suffering to others, and this relationship was significant even when other Cluster B personality disorders were controlled. These findings suggest that NPD is a maladaptive personality style which primarily causes dysfunction and distress in interpersonal domains. The behavior of narcissistic individuals ultimately leads to problems and distress for the narcissistic individuals and for those with whom they interact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.10.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relatives of people diagnosed with NPD report increased distress and frustrated dependency striving.

    “Relatives of people diagnosed with the disorder report increased distress and frustrated dependency striving (5, 42).”
  • The dismissal of measures of so-called normal narcissism as nonpathological appears to result from overemphasizing subjective distress while underemphasizing impairment and distress caused to others.

    “The dismissal of measures of so-called normal narcissism as nonpathological appears to be the result of overemphasizing the role of subjective distress while underemphasizing the role of impairment and distress caused to others (Miller et al. 2007).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Miller et al. 2007

  • Grandiose narcissism/NPD is associated with poor ability to understand one's own mental states and the mental states of others.

    “Grandiose narcissism has been associated with poor ability to understand one’s own mental states and the mental states of others.”
  • Social impairment may function as a mediator between narcissism and personal distress.

    “Considering that previous research studies have highlighted that social impairment may function as a mediator between narcissism and personal distress [15], envy may prove to be linked to symptomatic distress as an emotional marker of social impairment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Pilkonis, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
170-177
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167855484
Cited by
278
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH044672, R01MH056888, R01 MH56888, R01-MH-44672)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narcissistic personality disorder, construct validity, psychological distress, functional disability, depression, anxiety, interpersonal problems, cluster B personality disorders, psychiatric patients, community sample
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Sex Factors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review