Cited by 85Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Down-Regulating Narcissistic Tendencies: Communal Focus Reduces State Narcissism

Giacomin, Miranda, Jordan, Christian H.·2014·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Narcissism has been conceptualized as a set of coherent, mutually reinforcing attributes that orients individuals toward self-enhancement and positive self-feelings. In this view, reducing one element of narcissism—such as a greater concern for agency than communion—may situationally reduce narcissism in a state-like manner. Across five studies, we found that increasing communal focus toward others decreases state narcissism. In Study 1, participants induced to feel empathy reported less state narcissism. In Studies 2 to 4, participants primed with interdependent self-construal reported less state narcissism than control participants and those primed with independent self-construal. Furthermore, in Study 4, changes in state narcissism mediated changes in desire for fame and perceptions that others deserve help. Thus, changes in one element of narcissism may situationally reduce narcissistic tendencies. These findings suggest that narcissism is more state-like and context-dependent than previously assumed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167213516635

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results support the notion that an individual's narcissism presentation may fluctuate over time and that vulnerable and grandiose presentations are inter-related and oscillating.

    “As such, these results support the notion that an individual’s narcissism presentation may fluctuate over time [20, 21] and that vulnerable and grandiose presentations are inter-related and oscillating [9, 19].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism may reflect both sides of a narcissistic 'coin' that may be regularly oscillating, inter-related and state dependent.

    “While the differences in presentation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism appear manifest, it has been argued that they reflect both sides of a narcissistic ‘coin’ [9] that may be regularly oscillating, inter-related and state dependent [6, 18–22].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H.
Affiliations
Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2013-12-17
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
488-500
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2159422398
Cited by
85
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
narcissism, self-enhancement, empathy, interdependent self-construal, independent self-construal, self-construal priming
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Empathy, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Narcissism, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review