Cited by 144Social and Intergroup PsychologyEmbodied and Extended CognitionPsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Influence of Motor Processes on Attitudes Toward Novel Versus Familiar Semantic Stimuli

Priester, Joseph R., Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E.·1996·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that the motor processes elicited by upper arm isometric flexion and extension can subtly influence attitudes. Specifically, ideographs evaluatively categorized while performing isometric upper arm flexion were subsequently preferred to ideographs evaluatively categorized while performing isometric upper arm extension. The present research sought to replicate this attitudinal effect with semantic stimuli and to examine a theoretical boundary condition posited by the elaboration likelihood model (ELM). Subjects categorized either neutral words or pronounceable nonwords while adopting the isometric positions. Results indicated that motor processes influenced subsequent attitudes toward stimuli with few associations (i.e., nonwords) more than toward stimuli with many associations in memory (i.e., familiar words). These results are consistent with a growing literature on the possible influence of nondeclarative (e.g., procedural) knowledge on attitudes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167296225002

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545 · DOI
  2. Kucera, H., 1967, Computational anatysis of present-day American English
  3. Srull, T. K., 1983, Advances in Consumer Re-search, 10, 520

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 144

Metadata

Authors
Priester, J. R., Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Fordham University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1996-05
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
442-447
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2108714233
Cited by
144
References
39
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
motor processes, attitudes, isometric extensions, elaboration likelihood model, procedural knowledge, ideograms, semantic association

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review