Cited by 1,444Behavioral Health and InterventionsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyMedia Influence and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group Norms and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: A Role for Group Identification

Terry, Deborah J., Hogg, Michael A.·1996·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Two studies provided support for the proposal that the role of norms in attitude-behavior relations can be usefully reconceptualized from the perspective of social identity/self-categorization theory. The first study revealed that the perceived norms of a behaviorally relevant reference group influenced intentions to engage in regular exercise, but only for subjects who identified strongly with the group, whereas the effect of perceived behavioral control (a personal factor) was strongest for low identifiers. Similarly, Study 2 revealed that the effect of group norms on females' intentions to engage in sun-protective behavior was evident only for high identifiers and that the effects of one of the personal variables (attitude) was stronger for low than for high identifiers. Additional results revealed that the perceived group norm predicted subjects' attitude, as did the perceived consequences of performing the behavior. The latter result was evident only for low identifiers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167296228002

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ajzen, I., 1988, Attitudes, personality, and behaviour
  2. Cohen, J., 1983, Applied multiple regression for the behavioural sciences
  3. Eagly, A. H., 1993, The psychology of attitudes
  4. 10.1086/296148 · DOI
  5. Fishbein, M., 1993, The theory of reasoned action: Its application to AIDS1-reventive behaviour, v
  6. Melanoma Foundation of Australia., 1987, You, the sun and skin cancer [Pamphlet]
  7. Rigby, K., 1993, The theory of reasoned action: Its application to AlDS-preventive behaviour, 93
  8. Tajfel, H., 1981, Intergroup behaviour, 144
  9. Terry, D. J., 1993, The theory of reasoned action: Its application to AlDS-preventive behaviour, 1
  10. Turner, J. C., 1985, Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 77
  11. Turner, J. C., 1991, Social influence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Terry, Deborah J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1996-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
776-793
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2082130134
Cited by
1,444
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 64
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
group norms, attitude-behavior relationship, group identification, social identity theory, self-categorization theory, reference groups, exercise intention, sun protection behavior, perceived behavioral control, perceived consequences, normative influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review