Cited by 19Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Food Palatability, Rheology, and Meal Patterning

Mattes, Richard D.·2008·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: Overweight and obesity are largely of dietary origin and reflect food choice. Food palatability, eating patterns, and food form are important determinants of choice and energy balance. Methods: A review of the literature provides a characterization of the roles of these determinants of feeding. Results: Food palatability is the strongest predictor of intake where availability is not limiting. Whether the rewarding properties of palatable items lead to nonhomeostatic feeding and weight gain warrants further study. Positive energy balance is attributed to greater energy intake within eating events but also to a greater extent, increased eating frequency. Although the size and frequency of eating events may compensate for each other, interventions aimed at limiting the latter may be especially productive. One of the most marked dietary trends is an increase of energy derived from beverages. The weak dietary compensation that energy‐yielding beverages elicit leads to positive energy balance. This, too, is a promising target for moderating energy intake. Conclusions: A better understanding of dietary factors promoting positive energy balance should reveal strategies for weight management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607108321706

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meals have been described according to three constructs: patterning, format, and context.

    “Meals have been described according to three constructs: (1) patterning (for example, frequency, spacing, regularity, skipping, timing); (2) format (for example, types of food combinations, sequencing of foods, nutrient profile/content); and (3) context (for example, eating with others or with the family, eating in front of the television or out of the home) (Table 1)( 10 – 13 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattes, R. D.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Mattes, Richard D.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
572-574
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2095485913
Cited by
19
References
26
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U13DK064190)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
palatability, food rheology, meal frequency, energy balance, obesity, food choice, weight management
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Sensation, Weight Gain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review